| 
 1878 History 
of 
Ashtabula Co., Ohio 
with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of its' Pioneers and Most 
Prominent Men. Philadelphia Williams Brothers 1878 256 pgs. 
ALSO NOTE:  I will transcribe biographies upon request.  Please 
state the County and State in the Subject line of the email. ~ SW 
BIOGRAPHIES 
< CLICK HERE to GO to 
1878 BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX > 
< CLICK HERE to GO to LIST of TABLES 
of CONTENTS and BIOGRAPHICAL INDEXES > 
  
  
    
      
      
		  
		
		Residence of 
		
		Hon. Benjamin F. Wade, 
		
		Jefferson, Ohio
		
		  
		B. F. Wade 
  | 
      
      
		Jefferson Twp. - 
		
		BENJAMIN FRANKLIN WADE. 
		
		
		     In West Springfield, Massachusetts, there is a region abounding in 
		beautiful but rugged hills, whose slopes in the early days were devoted 
		to the pasturage of herds and flocks; and from that circumstance it was 
		called "Feeding Hills Parish."  Here the subject of this sketch was 
		born.  He commenced with the century, Oct. 27, 1800.  The present 
		generation have but a faint conception of the condition of the country 
		and the hardships endured by that people in those times.  His father, James 
		Wade, 
		had been a soldier of the Revolution, and the events of that period had 
		deprived him of the means of supporting a large family and giving them 
		more than the ordinary education afforded by the common schools. 
		
		     Work was the rule; schools were few and beyond the reach of many; 
		children were compelled to share the privations and toil of their 
		seniors.  Frank, 
		for so he was then and through all his earlier years familiarly called, 
		lost no opportunity of making himself acquainted with all the books that 
		came with his reach.  Hence, when he arrived at maturity he had acquired 
		a fund of historical and general information far superior to many who 
		had enjoyed all the advantages of a higher classical education.  In the 
		fall of 1821, James 
		Wade and 
		his family removed to Andover, in the county of Ashtabula, Ohio.  Here Frank  was 
		for two years employed in clearing land and with the ordinary work of a 
		farm during the summer, and in the winter as a teacher of common 
		schools. 
		
		     In the fall of 1823 he assisted in driving a drove of cattle over 
		the mountains of Philadelphia; and from there he went to Massachusetts, 
		performing the whole distance on foot.  His brother James was 
		then a practicing physician near Albany, in the State of New York.  
		Here Frank commenced 
		the study of medicine, but becoming dissatisfied with that profession he 
		abandoned it, and in the fall of 1825 returned to Andover.  It was 
		during his stay in the State of New York at this time that, being 
		without funds and finding no other employment for which money could be 
		obtained, he labored for a time, with spade and wheelbarrow, upon the 
		Erie canal, which was then in process of construction.  Many years 
		later, Mr. Seward, 
		speaking in the United States senate and alluding to this incident, 
		said, “From whence came the labor that performed that work?  I know but 
		one American citizen who worked with spade and wheelbarrow upon those 
		works.  Doubtless there are many others, but I know but one, and he, I 
		am glad to say, is a member on this floor,—Mr. Wade, 
		of Ohio, and one of the most talented members.”  His younger brother, Edward, 
		who has since for many years ably represented the Cuyahoga district in 
		congress, was at that time a student in the law-office of the Hon. 
		Elisha Whittlesey, 
		at Canfield, Ohio. 
		
		     Frank was 
		induced to join his brother in that office, and at the end of two years 
		was admitted to the bar, at Jefferson, Ashtabula County, Ohio.  Here he 
		commenced the practice of his profession, and soon acquired the 
		reputation of an acute special pleader and a successful advocate.  Joshua 
		R. Giddings was 
		then a leading lawyer, having the largest practice of any attorney in 
		the county.  In 1831, Mr. Wade entered 
		into partnership with that gentleman, and they continued together in a 
		large and successful practice in Ashtabula and the adjoining counties 
		until 1838, when Mr. 
		Giddings was 
		elected to congress.  In the fall of 1835, Mr. Wade was 
		elected prosecuting attorney for the county of Ashtabula.  This was his 
		first public position, and from that time forward his talents, fidelity, 
		and energy assured him the confidence of the public. 
		
		     In the fall of the year 1837 the Whig convention nominated him, and 
		he was elected a member of the Ohio State senate.  This nomination was 
		made in his absence and without his knowledge or desire.  Up to this 
		time the subject of southern slavery, as an element of political and 
		party contention, had scarcely been agitated.  Legislation both State 
		and national had all favored the institution, and there existed in Ohio 
		a miserable set of black laws which was the product of the prevailing 
		sentiment of the country.  But at the same time the better feelings of 
		human nature could not be wholly suppressed.  There were some in the 
		south who saw and felt the injustice of the institution and favored 
		emancipation; and arrangements had been made by which a settlement of 
		blacks was formed at a place called Red Oak, on the free side of the 
		Ohio river, where those who desired could bring their slaves and 
		emancipate them.  This settlement created a feeling of jealousy on both 
		sides of the line.  The conservative spirits of the north feared they 
		might be overrun by the blacks, and the slave-holders were alarmed by 
		any movement which had a tendency to weaken or relax the rigor of the 
		slave system or to ameliorate the condition of the slaves.  Fugitives 
		from slavery were frequently 
		
		escaping across the line, and were either harbored in Ohio, or were 
		aided in their flight to Canada.  Thus it happened that, not content 
		with the state of things then existing, in 1838 the legislature of 
		Kentucky sent two commissioners, Messrs. Morehead and Price,—the 
		one a Whig and the other a Democrat,—to persuade the legislature of Ohio 
		to pass still more rigorous and effective laws for the return of 
		fugitive slaves. This measure was proposed in the Ohio senate, and Mr. Wade and 
		only four others arrayed themselves in opposition to its passage.  These 
		five senators, of course, could do nothing but obstruct and delay the 
		passage of the measure.  But this was so boldly and adroitly done that 
		the commissioners sought an interview with Mr. Wade, 
		in hopes to mitigate his opposition to their scheme. 
		
		     That meeting was amusing and characteristic.  They came with an 
		injured and deprecating air, as though appealing to the better feelings 
		of his nature.  They told him of the patriarchal character of the 
		institution, and how slaves were treated by their masters as their own 
		children, and showed the cruelty of sundering such ties of tenderness, 
		and consequently the necessity of more stringent laws to prevent the 
		evil.  Mr. Wade did 
		not see the character of the institution in that light, and in response 
		to Mr. Morehead, 
		the Whig commissioner, he said, “ You want us to pass a law to prevent 
		your children from running away.  In other words, you want to make us 
		all negro-catchers.  Gentlemen, do you engage in this business of 
		negro-catching, yourselves?  I see you do not.  If I were master in 
		Ohio, and found you in this negro-hunting business, I would put you in 
		irons.”  Price, 
		the Democratic commissioner, cried out, “By heavens!  Morehead, 
		he has got us; it is certainly not the most honorable business.”  So 
		ended the memorable interview.  The resistance to the passage of the 
		bill was protracted two days and one entire night, and a part of 
		another.  The following extract from a speech made by Mr. Wade on 
		that occasion may be interesting to those who remember the excitement 
		that followed upon the passage of those fugitive slave laws: 
		
		     “ Though I stand here at two o’clock at night, and after a 
		protracted session since yesterday at nine o’clock in the morning, and 
		though I speak to ears that are deaf and to hearts impervious to a sense 
		of right and justice and liberty, still I will be heard; and although, 
		from the timid and servile policy that has been manifested by the 
		majority on this floor, I have no hope of arresting the progress of this 
		measure, which shall ere long stamp its supporters with deeper infamy 
		and degradation than did the famous ‘alien and sedition laws.’  The 
		champions of this measure, like the heroes of old, before taking up the 
		gauntlet in its defense, have thought proper to preface their remarks 
		with a history of their own birth, habits, and education; and, as I 
		suspected, it appears that they were themselves born or descended from 
		parents who were born in the murky atmosphere of slavery.  Were I to 
		follow their example and speak of so unimportant a subject as myself, I 
		would say that I was born in a land where the accursed system of slavery 
		was unknown; where the councils of the State were swayed by the great 
		principles of equality; where right and justice were deemed the greatest 
		expediency.  My infancy was rocked in the cradle of universal liberty, 
		and my parents were of the Revolution. The earliest lesson I was taught 
		was to respect the rights of others and to defend my own; to resist 
		oppression to the death neither do nor suffer wrong; to do unto others 
		as I would they should do unto me; and, though my venerated instructors 
		have long since passed away, the Godlike principles they taught can 
		never die; and when they shall cease to influence my conduct, may my 
		right hand forget its cunning and my tongue cleave to the roof of my 
		mouth!” 
		
		     The five senators made a gallant but ineffectual resistance.  The 
		measure was carried, and slavery triumphed for the time.  But the event 
		stamped Mr. Wade as 
		a man of mark, and one of the most fearless and formidable opponents of 
		the slave-power.  It brought him into immediate and signal notice, and 
		men came to him from the Red Oak settlement bearing a petition, 
		numerously signed, for a charter establishing an academy to educate the 
		freedmen at that place.  On the presentation of the petition a storm 
		broke forth.  “Do you know that these are niggers?”  And resolutions 
		were offered to expel him from the senate, so violent were the feelings 
		against him for presenting a petition signed by colored men.  But while 
		a member of the senate of Ohio he performed noble work in other 
		respects.  He was a member of the judiciary committee, and exerted a 
		controlling influence in abolishing imprisonment for debt in Ohio, and 
		also for the passage of a law exempting certain property from execution. 
		
		     The legislature was then beset by applications for aid to various 
		public and private enterprises to promote internal improvements in the 
		State, which resulted in what were afterwards known as the “Plunder 
		laws."  These he opposed, and thereby incurred violent opposition from 
		members of his own party.  In the fall of 1839 he was renominated by the 
		Whig party in the district, in their regular convention.  There was a 
		Whig majority in the district of four thousand, but so strung was the 
		pro-slavery feeling in the district, and especially in his own county of 
		Ashtabula, that he was beaten, and a Democrat elected in his place.  But 
		during the ensuing two years there was a marvelous change wrought in the 
		feelings of the people.  During the presidential canvass of 1840 he was 
		prominent in the advocacy of General Harrison for 
		President, and his voice was heard from almost every platform in 
		northern Ohio; and when the Whig district convention met in 1841 he was 
		again nominated as a candidate for the Ohio senate by acclamation.  The 
		subject of slavery had been discussed, the views of Mr. Wade had 
		become popular in the district, and his election was then triumphant.  
		In the winter of 1841 and 1842 he resigned the office, but was again 
		elected in the fall of 1842.  And during his service in the senate he 
		had the satisfaction of seeing the Kentucky black laws erased from the 
		statute-book of the State.  He then declined further service, and 
		devoted himself to the practice of his profession. 
		
		     In the spring of 1837 he entered into partnership in the practice 
		of law with Rufus 
		P. Ranney, 
		who had previously been a student in his office.  The business of that 
		firm was very large, requiring their attendance upon all the courts in 
		several counties in the northeast corner of the State.  This partnership 
		continued until Mr. Wade was 
		elected to a judicial position. 
		
		     In 1841 he was married to Miss Caroline Rosekrans, 
		of Middletown, in the State of Connecticut.  By her he has two sons, 
		both of whom performed service for the country in the war of the 
		Rebellion.  James 
		F., the 
		oldest son, still remains in the cavalry service, where he now holds the 
		commission of major, and has had several brevets for meritorious 
		services. 
		
		     In February, 1847, Mr. Wade was 
		elected by the legislature of the State presiding judge of the third 
		judicial circuit, embracing the counties of Ashtabula, Trumbull, 
		Mahoning, Portage, and Summit.  He entered immediately upon the duties 
		of the office, which he continued to hold until March, 1851, when he was 
		elected to the senate of the United States.  The circuit was large, and 
		the dockets of the several courts were very much encumbered with 
		business when he went upon the bench, but his high legal attainments and 
		application to business enabled him to dispatch the business of the 
		courts with great facility, and he soon became as popular on the bench 
		as he had previously been at the bar.  The intelligence of his election 
		to the United States senate was brought to him in the court-room, while 
		presiding in court at Akron, in Summit county.  The papers in the 
		northeastern portion of the State had urged his election to that 
		position but still the news of his election came to him wholly 
		unexpected, and like every other official position which he had held it 
		was unsolicited on his part.  He did not feel at liberty or disposed to 
		decline the high honor, and assumed its duties and responsibilities, and 
		continued to hold the position for eighteen years, during the most 
		interesting period of the history of the country. 
		
		     He entered the senate just after the notable compromise measures of 
		1851.  The terrible storm in which those measures had been adopted had 
		been allayed, but not spent.  The compact imposed eternal silence upon 
		the north on the subject of slavery in the councils of the nation.  It 
		also laid upon the north the ungracious burden of returning fugitive 
		slaves. 
		
		     Parties were preparing for the presidential contest.  The Whigs had 
		become demoralized by the death of President Taylor, 
		and the trouble and perplexity arising from the administration of President Fillmore.  
		Both of the great national parties gave in their adhesion to the 
		measures of the compromise, and adopted the same plank of eternal 
		silence on the subject of slavery.  But there was no silence! 
		
		     The first day that Mr. Wade took 
		his seat in the American senate, Mr. Foote, 
		of Mississippi, introduced a series of resolutions to confirm what had 
		already been done by congress on the subject of slavery, and upon these 
		resolutions frequent speeches were made during that session.  The 
		canvass of 1852 resulted in the election of Franklin Pierce to 
		the presidency, and with him a Democratic congress. 
		
		     Mr. Douglas, 
		chairman of the committee on Territories, reported in favor of the 
		organization of Kansas and Nebraska, leaving the report silent on the 
		subject of slavery.  Upon this a fiery debate sprung up; speeches were 
		made by southern men of the most inflammable character, claiming that 
		the old Missouri Compromise of 1821 should be abrogated.  The report was 
		recommitted and amended, containing the proposed abrogation of that old 
		national treaty. 
		
		     After the nomination of General Taylor for 
		the presidency in 1848, a large majority of the Whig party on the 
		Western Reserve revolted and refused to vote for the nominee for the 
		reason that he was a slave-holder, and uniting with the Democrats who 
		were disaffected with the nomination of General Cass by 
		their party, under the name of Free Democrats, supported Martin Van Buren for 
		the presidency.  Van Buren, 
		when in the presidential chair, had shown himself most subservient to 
		the slave power.  Mr. Wade had 
		confidence in General Taylor for 
		uprightness, and believed he could be relied upon for integrity and 
		impartiality, and he therefore zealously supported the slave-holder in 
		preference to the northern man with southern principles, although he was 
		thereby placed in a minority among his own friends and associates.  The 
		death of General Taylor elevated Mr. Fillmore to 
		the presidency.  Mr. Wade, 
		though sadly disappointed in the course pursued by President Fillmore, 
		still adhered to the Whig party. 
		
		      He agreed with that party upon the subject of a protective tariff, 
		river and harbor improvements, and other kindred measures, and many of 
		the southern Whigs had proposed to hold generous and moderate sentiments 
		on the subject of slavery, and he hoped that the old Whig party might be 
		instrumental in bringing back the government to the purposes of its 
		founders.  He therefore, in 1852, supported the nomination of General Scott, 
		and vigorously urged his election before the people.  In March, 1854, 
		during the agitation of the proposed repeal of the Missouri Compromise, 
		he made a speech in the senate clearly defining his opposition to the 
		measure, and fully demonstrating that the repeal of that act would be 
		fraught with more evil to the country and more danger to its peace than 
		had ever occurred to disturb the harmony of the different sections.  He 
		learned from the discussions upon the question that it was to be carried 
		by a combination of the southern Whigs and those who, for the occasion, 
		assumed the name of “National Democrats.”  At this union for such a 
		purpose his heart sickened, and he gave utterance to his feelings in a 
		speech delivered in the senate on the night of the final passage of the 
		measure.  The New York Tribune of that date appropriately called it the 
		“ new declaration of independence.”  In the course of that speech he 
		severed his connection with the Whig party, and bade farewell to his 
		former Whig friends of the south.  A short extract from that speech may 
		not be inappropriate.  He said, “Mr. President, I do not intend to 
		debate this subject.  The humiliation of the north is complete and 
		overwhelming.  No southern enemy of the north can wish her deeper 
		degradation.  God knows, I feel it keenly enough, and I do not wish to 
		prolong the melancholy spectacle.  I have all my life belonged to the 
		great national Whig party, and never yet have I failed, with all the 
		ability I possessed, to support its regular nominations, come from what 
		portion of the Union they might; and much oftener has it been my lot to 
		battle for a southern than for a northern nominee for the presidency, 
		and when such candidate was assailed by those who were jealous of 
		slave-holders, and our people did not like to yield the government to 
		such hands, how often have I encountered the violent prejudices with no 
		little hazard to myself.  How triumphantly would I appeal on such 
		occasions to southern honor, to the magnanimity of soul which I believed 
		actuated southern gentlemen.  Alas! If God will pardon me for what I 
		have done, I will promise to sin no more in that direction.  We 
		certainly cannot have any further connection with Whigs of the south.  
		They have rendered such connection impossible.  An impassable gulf 
		separates us. The southern wing of the old Whig party have joined their 
		fortunes with what is called the ‘National Democracy,’ and I wish you 
		joy in your new connection.  Tomorrow, I believe, there is to be an 
		eclipse of the sun, and I think it is meet and proper that the sun in 
		the heavens and the glory of this republic should go into obscurity and 
		darkness together.  Let the bill then pass; it is a proper occasion for 
		so dark and damning a deed.”  No words could do justice to the feelings 
		of the man, or the occasion which called them forth.  From that time he 
		knew no Whig party.  He joined in the organization of the Republican 
		party, and devoted himself earnestly to the advocacy and support of the 
		principles and measures of that party in congress and before the people 
		from Maine to the Mississippi. 
		
		     In congress the issue was now clearly defined.  The south declared 
		the institution of slavery to be holy, and insisted that it should be 
		extended and made coextensive with the bounds of the republic; while the 
		north declared the institution to be inhuman and a relic of barbarism, 
		and insisted that it should be limited to the territory it then 
		occupied.  A southern senator had declared that he would call the roll 
		of his slaves at the foot of Bunker Hill monument, and that threat had 
		met with defiance from northern men. 
		
		     The repeal of the Missouri Compromise was the torch that lighted 
		the pile.  It raised the tempest that culminated in the Rebellion.  
		There were but few men from the north in the senate who had the courage 
		to speak out boldly on that question, but Mr. Wade was 
		conspicuous among that number.  Events followed of a startling 
		character.  The old land-mark of peace was obliterated.  Then came 
		
		the border ruffians, asking for the admission of Kansas as a slave 
		State.  Douglas, Broderick, 
		and a few other Democrats became alarmed, and a sense of common danger 
		drove them to take counsel with some of the most extreme radicals.  Of 
		all men in the senate, Mr. Wade was 
		most feared, trusted, and respected by his political opponents.  He was 
		a plain, blunt man, like Marc Antony, 
		and spoke right on.  He had none of the graces of oratory; what he said 
		was clear, simple, and direct. In a single sentence he would sometimes 
		annihilate an opponent.  An instance of this occurred in the debate on 
		the Kansas-Nebraska question, when Mr. Badger, 
		of North Carolina, appealed to the senate in a sentimental way.  “What!” 
		said he, “will you not allow me to take my old mammy with me to Kansas; 
		she on whose breast my infancy was cradled; who watched over my 
		childhood and takes pride in my manhood?”  “Yes,” said Mr. Wade, 
		“we will permit you to take your old mammy to Kansas, but we will 
		prohibit you, by law, from selling her after you get her there.”  Mr. Badger was 
		extinguished.  That argument admitted of no reply.  Badger was 
		afterwards heard to say that Wade was 
		the only man he could never get even with. In the same debate, a New 
		Hampshire senator was making a speech subservient to the ideas of 
		southern gentlemen.  Mr. Wade was 
		listening attentively to him, when he suddenly turned and said he would 
		like to put a question to the senator from Ohio.  “Would he recognize 
		his obligations and perform his duty in executing the fugitive slave 
		law?”  Mr. Wade rose, 
		and, in language more emphatic than reverent or parliamentary, 
		responded, “No, sir;  I’d see ’em damned first.”  And he immediately 
		returned the question, but before the New Hampshire senator had 
		completed his argumentative reply, Mr. Wade turned 
		to the Kentucky senators and put the same question to them.  The 
		response came quickly, “No, sir; there is no occasion for it so long as 
		we have men like the honorable senator from New Hampshire to do it for 
		us.”  Nothing could have been more humiliating to the New Hampshire 
		senator. 
		
		     During those years the greatest excitement prevailed in congress, 
		as well as the country, and scenes of violence were rife on every hand.  
		The code of honor was prevalent at the south, while at the north it was 
		condemned by public sentiment.  The result was that the conduct of many 
		southern men became overbearing and insolent.  Challenges could be given 
		with impunity, as it was known that no challenge could be accepted by a 
		northern man without incurring social and political ostracism among his 
		own people.  At this time a few men in congress, among whom were Wade, Chandler, Broderick, Douglas, 
		and Cameron, 
		of the senate, and Burlingame, Potter, 
		and others of the house, agreed that they would submit to no further 
		insolence, and that they would accept the first challenge given by any 
		southern member of congress.  That if assailed in words they would 
		resent the insult in words, and if challenged they would fight.  In the 
		session of 1856, Mr. Sumner spoke 
		in the senate on the “ barbarism of slavery.”  The next day he was 
		stricken down in the senate chamber by Preston 
		S. Brooks, 
		of South Carolina.  Senator Toombs, 
		of Georgia, declared that he witnessed the assault, and declared his 
		approbation of the deed.  He said, “It was nothing more than the senator 
		from Massachusetts richly deserved; he had played the part of a dog, and 
		he merited the treatment of a dog.”  Mr. Wade, 
		in response to Toombs, 
		said, “Those are the sentiments of a coward and an assassin.”  A duel 
		was expected as the result, and Mr. Wade made 
		his arrangements accordingly.  Colonel James 
		Watson Webb, 
		who before that time had some experience in dueling, volunteered to act 
		on his behalf.  Inquiries were made whether a challenge would be 
		accepted; but no challenge came, and on the morning of the fourth day Toombs approached Wade cheerfully, 
		and said, “What is the use of a man’s making a damned fool of himself 
		?”  “There isn't much,” replied Wade, 
		“but some men can’t help it.”  So ended the expected duel, to the 
		chagrin of many of the southern members. 
		
		     Some little time afterwards there was renewed excitement in the 
		chamber.  The Democrats were resorting to all manner of dilatory 
		movements, when Senator 
		Toombs arose 
		and launched out into a most violent denunciation of the north and 
		northern men, and especially northern members of congress.  He was just 
		in the height of his declamation, when Mr. Wade arose, 
		and demanded to know if he was included in the invective?  Mr. Toombs was 
		suddenly brought to his senses, and replied, “No; he excepted the 
		senator from Ohio,” and then went off into a glowing panegyric of Mr. Wade.  
		Another instance of Mr. 
		Wade’s 
		vindication of justice, and of his bold and decided character, came out 
		in a passage which occurred between the Hon. John 
		M. Clayton and 
		himself during the existence of the American or Know-Nothing party, the 
		purposes of which Mr. 
		Clayton reviewed 
		in an elaborate speech in the senate.  Senator 
		Wade was 
		deeply interested in the passage of the “Homestead bill,” and upon this 
		bill he stood side by side with Senator Dodge, 
		a Democratic senator from Iowa.  He brought all his influence to bear 
		upon the success of the measure, and had delivered a powerful argument 
		in favor of the bill, setting forth the advantages to the country, the 
		pioneer, and the emigrant.  Mr. Clayton followed, 
		commenting upon the speech in a frank but friendly spirit, to which Mr. Wade took 
		no exceptions.  The speeches were supposed to be printed in the 
		Congressional Globe as they had been delivered in the senate.  Mr. Wade took 
		no pains to revise or prepare his speeches for publication, but trusted 
		that work entirely to the reporter, and had not looked to see that those 
		speeches were correctly reported.  A few days afterwards, Mr. Dodge came 
		to him and asked him if he had seen Senator Clayton’s 
		reply to his speech on the Homestead bill, as printed in the Globe, 
		saying, “You ought to take notice of it, as he has ascribed sentiments 
		to you which I am sure you never held, and has put language into your 
		mouth which you never uttered.”  On looking into the Globe the 
		representations were found to be true, and Mr. Wade lost 
		no time in calling to it the attention of the senate and the public.  He 
		was willing to suppose that the senator from Delaware had, through 
		mistake or inadvertence, attributed to him opinions and expressions 
		which would be offensive to his constituents and the country.  He had 
		satisfied himself that the reporter of the senate had faithfully 
		transcribed his language, and he could not account for the course the 
		senator from Delaware had pursued.  Mr. Clayton interrupted 
		with the remark, accompanied by a malicious glance, “When the senator 
		gets through I will give my version of the matter.”  Mr. Wade concluded 
		by saying, “It is therefore a mistake or something worse.”  Mr. Clayton followed 
		in a lofty, justifying strain, in which he bore down severely on Mr. Wade, 
		and took his seat, leaving the impression on every mind that he had made 
		no mistake, and that his review of the speech of the senator from Ohio 
		was exactly right.  Then Mr. Wade, 
		rising to his feet, and with a deliberate manner, and looking Clayton 
		full in the face, declared, “ You, sir, sneaked into your office and 
		wrote what you knew to be false.”  This was the signal for the 
		intervention of the presiding officer, and the matter was at once 
		dropped in the chamber, but of course it was anticipated that Mr. Clayton, 
		as a southern man, would not let the matter rest.  That evening Senator Pratt, 
		of Maryland, acting as the friend of Mr. Clayton, 
		called on Mr. Wade at 
		his lodgings to inquire on behalf of the senator from Delaware if Mr. Wade was 
		a fighting man,—if he recognized the code?  Free from the restraint of 
		parliamentary rules and the decorum of the senate, Mr. Wade replied, 
		“Go tell the scoundrel if he is tired of life and wants to know my views 
		of dueling, he can find out by sending the communication in the usual 
		form.”  Senator Pratt remonstrated 
		upon the severity of this reply, and tried to have him soften it.  “I do 
		not desire to have you act in the matter,” said Mr. Wade, 
		“but if you tell him anything you will give him my answer unmodified.”  
		The following morning they met, and Senator Wade was 
		first to speak.  “Well, senator, what next?”  “Nothing, nothing at all,” 
		said Senator Pratt; 
		“ he is a damned old coward.”  There was no further intercourse between Messrs. Clayton and Wade for 
		the remainder of the senatorial term.  When within a few days of its 
		close, and Mr. Clayton was 
		to retire to private life, he one day came to Senator Wade, 
		his eyes filled with tears, and his voice trembling with emotion, and 
		said, “Senator, that affair which has so long interrupted our 
		friendship, has cost me more trouble of mind than almost any other of my 
		life.  I feel that I have done you injustice, and that I ought to 
		rectify it here in the senate, before I leave it forever.  I will do so 
		in any manner you may suggest.”  And the brave heart, so quick to 
		vindicate wounded honor, melted immediately with kindness.  “No,” said 
		he: “Mr. Clayton, 
		it would have gratified me in the day of it; but it has long gone by, 
		the circumstance is forgotten; to revive it now will only open to the 
		public an old wound which they think nothing of.  It will be up-hill 
		business to do it now.  Let it rest in oblivion where we have consigned 
		it.”  They grasped hands. Such was the magnanimity which covered the 
		fault of a fellow-man. 
		
		     These qualities of mind and heart made him respected even by his 
		most violent political opponents in the senate far more than many a 
		northern doughface, whose subserviency they both employed and despised.  
		After these occurrences they were really better friends than if he had 
		truckled to their dictation, or failed to show that he would brook no 
		insolence and hold no malice.  In truth, it became quite customary for 
		gentlemen from the south to pay him public compliments, and the matter 
		went so far that one day when Senator Mason had 
		been saying some very nice things of him, he, with some pleasantry, 
		repelled the praise, responding to the senator from Virginia, “Sir, if 
		you do not stop saying these things of me it will ruin me at home.”  It 
		became quite common with some of the southern members of congress to 
		affect great independence of northern markets and manufactures by 
		wearing what they called home-made clothing.  In this matter Senator Mason, 
		of Virginia, was quite conspicuous.  He appeared one day in the senate 
		chamber clad from top to toe in a genuine suit of Virginia gray.  Wade accosted 
		him.  “Well, senator, you are well dressed to day,” at the same time 
		closely inspecting his dress.  “Yes,” said Mason, 
		“ I mean to do justice by the south, and by my own State in particular.  
		We will show that we are not dependent upon the north for a shred of 
		anything.”  Wade, 
		looking full of mischief, stepped up closer, and, taking hold of a 
		button on Mason's coat, 
		said, “Of course you will do that.  In what part of the south did you 
		obtain these buttons?”  They were, in fact, made in Connecticut, and Mason's face 
		fell as he growled out, “Nobody hut a damned Yankee would have found 
		that out.”  Senator Evans, 
		of South Carolina, a very bigoted and precise man, once came into the 
		senate chamber, and, taking his seat, lifted up a copy of the 
		Anti-Slavery Standard, which some one had placed there in his absence, 
		and then, turning to Mr. Wade, 
		who  was standing by, observed, “Who could have put this vile thing upon 
		my desk?”  “Why,” said Wade, 
		“it is a most excellent family paper.” “Ugh!” said Evans, 
		“ I would no sooner touch it than I would touch a toad.”  At this Wade laughed 
		heartily, and left the old gentleman in his tribulation.  On another 
		occasion, at the very close of the session, Mr. Evans was 
		in trouble about some bill, of no general importance, but in which quite 
		a number of his constituents were interested.  He had been trying all 
		winter to get it passed; but a few hours of the session remained, and 
		his anxiety was intensified.  It was late at night; Senator Foote, 
		of Vermont, was nodding in the chair.  The senate had been in continuous 
		session for two days and nights.  Probably not a quorum was present or 
		could have been found.  Some were absent, some in the ante-rooms, eating 
		or sleeping; only a few who could get the floor were attending to 
		business.  In his distress he came across the chamber to Mr. Wade, 
		on the radical side of the hall, a thing he seldom did, and which was 
		almost as offensive to him as the innocent paper he had found on his 
		desk, and said, “Here, sir, I have been all winter trying to get a bill 
		through in which some five hundred of my old neighbors are interested, 
		and the time is rapidly passing.  What can I do?”  “My friend,” said the 
		senator, “jump right up now, interrupt the proceedings, call up your 
		bill; now is the very time. I will help you.” Evans went 
		back to his seat and commenced fumbling about for a copy of his bill, 
		somewhat dazed at the sudden suggestion of his counselor, when Wade was 
		on his feet and called out, “Mr. President, the senator from South 
		Carolina, Mr. Evans, 
		has a bill of a private nature which has been pending for a long time; 
		he is anxious it should pass.  I move the rules be suspended for that 
		purpose.  It will take but a moment.” No one objected Mr. Evans was 
		recognized almost before he was aware of it.  His bill was passed, much 
		to his delight. “I declare,” said he, “nobody but a Yankee would have 
		gone to work in that way.”  This was the southern fashion in those days; 
		they spoke of all northern people as Yankees.  Such promptness of action 
		and readiness in expedients were always characteristic of him, at the 
		bar as well as in legislative halls. 
		
		     Captain 
		M. H. Simonds commanded 
		a company in Colonel 
		Ball’s 
		regiment of cavalry in the Mexican war.  He died in the service, leaving 
		three horses and a full outfit for the campaign.  The major of the 
		regiment, as his duty required, took possession of the property and 
		converted it to cash.  The major also died in the service, never having 
		accounted for the property, and leaving his estate insolvent.  The 
		mother of Captain Simonds, 
		who was a widow, applied to the departments at Washington for 
		compensation, but the claim was rejected on the ground that the loss 
		arose from the failure of the major to discharge his duty in accounting 
		for the property, and the government does not hold itself responsible 
		for the failure of its agents.  The equity of the case seemed so strong 
		that she appealed to congress for relief, and the application was placed 
		in the hands of Senator Wade.  
		The bill passed the senate promptly, but the committee on pensions, to 
		which the bill was referred in the house of representatives, rejected 
		the claim for the same reason urged against it by the departments.   At 
		the next session of congress the bill was again passed through the 
		senate, went to the house, and was again referred to the committee on 
		pensions, and the committee reported against the claim as before.  Mr. Wade labored 
		with the chairman of the committee, and urged the equity of the claim, 
		but he was deaf to all entreaties, and assured Mr. Wade that 
		he should not permit the bill to pass, under any circumstances, as he 
		should regard its passage as a dangerous precedent.  Some few days 
		after, Mr. Wade went 
		into the house of representatives and found the house engaged in passing 
		private bills, and he observed that the chairman of the committee on 
		pensions was absent.  He went to the seat of Mr. Morgan, 
		of New York, and told him the nature and merits of the claim and the 
		difficulties attending its passage.  Mr. Morgan expressed 
		his desire to aid him, but feared that nothing could be done; that it 
		could not be carried over an adverse report of the committee.  “Why,” 
		said Mr. Wade, 
		“don’t you see that they are now taking up the reports of committees and 
		passing the bills without objection ?”  “Yes,” said Morgan, 
		“ but in those cases the reports are all in favor of the claims, and in 
		this case the report, you see, is against the claim.”  “But,” said Wade, 
		“ you can move to take up the report and put the bill on its passage 
		without mentioning the fact that the report is adverse.” Morgan consented 
		to try the experiment.  The motion prevailed, and the bill passed 
		without objection.  Thus an equitable claim triumphed over technical 
		objections. 
		
		     In September, 1860, Senator Broderick, 
		of California, fell in a duel.  Mr. Wade held 
		that gentleman in high estimation, and regarded him as one of the most 
		reliable men in the senate on the subject of northern rights, which were 
		then imperiled.  And the circumstances regarding his death were such 
		that Mr. Wade regarded 
		him as a martyr to the cause of freedom.  The following expression of 
		his estimate of the character of Senator Broderick, 
		as made in the senate, is quoted here because of the striking similarity 
		of character between the fallen senator, as described by Mr. Wade, 
		and his distinguished eulogist: “Mr. President, though not of the same 
		political party, I cannot suffer this occasion to pass without 
		expressing my deep sense of the noble qualities and manly character of David 
		C. Broderick.  
		It was my good fortune to become well acquainted with him soon after he 
		took his seat in this body.  He was unassuming in manner, but frank, 
		outspoken, and sincere, despising all intrigue and indirection.  He was 
		possessed of an excellent understanding and a fine capacity for 
		business.  His love of justice was remarkable.  Having once determined 
		and settled in his own mind what was right, he was as immovable as the 
		hills.  Neither the threats or blandishments of power nor personal peril 
		could move him from his purpose.  Being of the people, their rights, 
		interests, and their advancement was the polar star of his action.  For 
		these he was at all times ready to labor, and, if need be, to die.  In 
		short, he was the very soul of honor, without fear and without 
		reproach.  The loss of such a man, Mr. President, 
		is indeed a public calamity.” 
		
		     Buchanan’s 
		administration had been as weak and imbecile as it was possible to be, 
		and events were culminating rapidly.  The Republican party had been 
		forced into existence by the very necessity of the time.  The 
		presidential canvass of 1860 had resulted in the election of Mr. Lincoln, 
		and the time intervening between November and the ensuing March, when he 
		was to be inaugurated, was used by southern members of congress to 
		promote the project of secession, and to plunge the country into civil 
		war.  It was a period of the utmost uncertainty and anxiety, when men’s 
		hearts failed them for fear, and when many who had been resolute on the 
		slavery question were trembling, vacillating, and ready to give 
		everything to the demands of the south.  Mr. Wade was 
		one of the few men who never flinched.  He looked the question squarely 
		in the face, and acted in that great emergency with a coolness and 
		deliberation which now seem surprising.  He was one of the famous joint 
		committee of thirteen to take into consideration the last peace 
		resolutions ever offered in congress for the conciliation of the two 
		sections,—the resolutions presented by Mr. Crittenden, 
		of Kentucky.  His associates on that committee from the senate were Messrs. Davis, Mason, Toombs, 
		and Benjamin.  
		In the consultations of this committee every inducement brought to bear 
		on Mr. Wade to 
		make him swerve one hair's breadth from the line of his convictions 
		proved utterly futile.  He told Mr. Davis, 
		who was the acknowledged leader of the southern men in congress, that he 
		was convinced that while the south professed to desire peace, that she 
		meant war; that the resolutions, however well designed by their author, 
		were only a delusion and a snare; that the north would not accept them, 
		and even if she did, it would not satisfy the augmenting demands of the 
		south.  “Well,” said Jefferson Davis, 
		“if war comes it will not be on our section on which it will spend its 
		force.”  He had good reason for saying this, for the opposition journals 
		of the north were teeming with declarations that if the black 
		Republicans adopted any measures of coercion to prevent secession they 
		would first have to encounter opposition at home, and to walk over the 
		dead bodies of countless Democrats, who would not, in such a crisis, 
		abandon the cause of their southern brethren.  But the reply of Mr. Wade showed 
		how well he understood the situation, how clearly he saw the real heart 
		of his countrymen through the mist and darkness of that perilous hour.  
		“I know," said he, “ what the city of New York has done; I know the 
		resolutions which have just been passed by two hundred thousand 
		Democrats in Ohio, and I know what has been done in Indiana; and let 
		them carry out the doctrine and purpose of their resolutions who can.  
		But the first gun that is fired will secure emancipation, and the 
		Democrats will desert you.  They are now leading you into a trap, and, 
		like the devil, they will leave you there to get out the best way you 
		can.”  The consultations of the committee failed; the counsels of the 
		great peace convention, held at Washington about the same time, failed.  
		Everything failed which even looked towards peace.  The tide of 
		alienation was sweeping all before it.  The Republican members of 
		congress, giving themselves up to the drifting current of events, sat 
		silent while the torrent of speech-making was flowing from southern 
		lips.  At length Mr. Wade got 
		the floor for the ensuing Monday; meantime Mr. Douglas came 
		to him and said, “I want to make a speech.  It shall be strong 
		anti-slavery.  There is no use talking longer for peace.  I will make 
		the speech on Monday if you will yield me the floor.”  To this Mr. Wade assented, 
		and Douglas kept 
		his mind until Sunday night, and then gave up his purpose.  It was just 
		as well.  Mr. Wade occupied 
		the floor on that signal Monday.  He did not speak very long, but long 
		enough to exhibit the real situation.  His words were blunt and plain.  
		He closed by saying, “You have made yourselves believe that you can whip 
		the north.  If, however, you should make a little mistake here, you will 
		be in hell!”  He afterwards remarked that Stephens, 
		of Georgia, had told them the same thing.  That speech had a vast 
		influence.  From that time forward there was little talk of peace.  The 
		southern States, led on by South Carolina, began to take measures and 
		pass ordinances of secession.  The southern members of congress began to 
		make farewell speeches, and to vacate their seats in the capitol. 
		
		     The 4th of March arrived.  Mr. Lincoln was 
		inaugurated in a scene of the greatest excitement and apprehension; and 
		old President Buchanan was 
		relieved, at once and forever, of the burden of a position where he had 
		been sitting for the last three months of his term crying and wringing 
		his hands and sobbing out his broken and incoherent and despairing 
		conversations with his visitors, “I have been the last President of the 
		United States.”  Fort Sumter was attacked on the 12th of April, 1861.  
		Congress had done its work and gone.  The new congress was summoned to 
		meet on the 4th of July of the same year.  Senator Wade was 
		early recognized as one of the few spirits who had the nerve to meet the 
		great emergency.  He was the chairman of the joint committee on the 
		conduct of the war, and held this position during the whole of that 
		bloody struggle which followed.  He was up early and late; he did an 
		immense amount of business, visiting the different sections of the 
		country and the armies in the field, and making reports, from time to 
		time, on the progress of the strife, the subjects of which now fill 
		eight large volumes, containing some of the most thrilling passages in 
		the history of the war.  It was towards the close of Mr. Lincoln’s 
		first term that the brilliant success in the southwest, which re-opened 
		Louisiana to the Federal jurisdiction, induced him to propose a line of 
		policy for the restoration of the recusant States that would have left 
		the whole subject of emancipation in a very precarious condition.  Senator Wade, 
		who was then chairman of the committee on Territories in the senate, 
		and Henry Winter Davis, 
		who was chairman of the committee on Territories in the house of 
		representatives, were the only men who stood up openly opposed to this 
		policy.  The subject came up just at the close of the session, which 
		gave them no opportunity to present the question fairly before 
		congress.  They therefore prepared a powerful manifesto against the 
		proposal of the President, signed it, and sent it to the New York 
		Tribune for publication.  Tried and pronounced against slavery, in all 
		its forms, as were the conductors of that paper, they refused to publish 
		the document; but it was issued in the form of a circular, and 
		effectually did the work; the scheme was abandoned.  This was done, not 
		out of opposition to Mr. Lincoln, 
		but because they saw more clearly than he seemed to see, the pernicious 
		tendency of his policy; they stood by him notwithstanding.  He was 
		chosen for a second term, and at last the fearful struggle was ended.  
		In his rejoicing over the result, Mr. Lincoln was 
		about again to yield to the weakness of excessive kindness.  He actually 
		went down to Richmond, after its occupation by our troops, and gave a 
		private order to General Heintzleman, 
		then in command in that city, to convene the old Confederate Virginia 
		State legislature, and to clothe them with all the authority they 
		possessed as a legislative body before the act of secession.  Then it 
		was that Senator Wade again 
		remonstrated and brought down upon himself much ignorant and ill-timed 
		censure of the press.  But the result showed him to be right in this, as 
		he was in his joint action with Mr. Davis before.  
		A commission of military men was formed to examine the action of the 
		officer in charge at Richmond.  When asked upon what authority he had 
		convoked the rebel legislature, he quietly drew forth an order in the 
		handwriting of Abraham Lincoln, 
		bearing a foot-note which read, “Show this to no one but Judge 
		John A. Campbell,”  
		who was still in Richmond, having been a member of the rebel cabinet.  
		But in the midst of these rapid and marvelous events President Lincoln was 
		shot down.  The nation and the world were shocked by the murderous 
		deed.  The whole order of things was changed by the elevation of Andrew Johnson to 
		the presidential chair.  Johnson proved 
		false to the Republican party and to the interests of the nation.  Mr. Wade was 
		now regarded as the head of the Republican party in the senate.  He was 
		made president pro tem, of the senate, and became vice-president in 
		fact.  The impeachment trial of Johnson followed, 
		and he was acquitted by one vote.  Had that trial resulted differently, Mr. Wade would 
		have succeeded Johnson in 
		the presidential chair.  In 1869, Mr. Wade retired 
		from the senate, and up to the time of his death remained much in 
		private life, occasionally, however, engaged in professional affairs, 
		which required his attendance at Washington during most of the sessions 
		of congress.  When, however, the excitement arose on the Saint Domingo 
		question, President Grant appointed 
		him chairman of the commission to visit Saint Domingo.  The expedition 
		was successfully accomplished, and a report was made which sustained the 
		views of the President and his action in relation thereto. 
		
		     In 1875, Mr. Wade participated 
		in the State canvass, and several public speeches were made by him in 
		behalf of the Republican party and General Hayes, 
		its candidate for governor.  He was a delegate from the Seventeenth 
		congressional district of Ohio in the Republican convention in 1876, and 
		was very influential in procuring the nomination of General Hayes as 
		the candidate for the presidency.  He was also one of the presidential 
		electors for the State at large, that cast the vote of Ohio for General Hayes for 
		President, and was selected to convey the electoral votes to Washington. 
		
		     He took a deep interest in the affairs of the nation, and was 
		prompt in expressing his disapprobation of the policy adopted by President Hayes, 
		regarding his course as unjust to the Republicans of the south and as 
		endangering the perpetuity of the Republican party, which Mr. Wade regarded 
		as essential to good government and the protection of the rights of the 
		citizens. 
		
		     In the summer of 1861, when the call of the President was issued 
		for seventy-five thousand men, in pursuance of a proclamation by the 
		governor of Ohio the citizens of Jefferson came together and were 
		addressed by Mr. Wade.  
		A call was made for volunteers, and Mr. Wade’s 
		name appeared first upon the roll.  The requisite number for a company 
		was immediately obtained, and the company was organized and their 
		services tendered to the governor.  But the result showed that seven 
		companies in Ashtabula County had organized at the same time, and the 
		governor could receive only two of that number.  The Jefferson company 
		was not one of those selected. 
		
		     Through life Mr. Wade was 
		abstemious in his habits, alike in eating and drinking, and he possessed 
		a strong and vigorous constitution, which rendered him capable of great 
		endurance, and this, with his indomitable perseverance and untiring 
		industry, always enabled him to discharge with promptness whatever 
		duties devolved upon him.  Hence he never seemed to be pressed with 
		business, but possessed much of apparent leisure. 
		
		     He was plain and unassuming in manners, whatever position he held, 
		whether at the bar, on the bench, or presiding over the senate of the 
		nation.  He was zealous and earnest in the advocacy of measures, and 
		sometimes sarcastic in language, but he impressed all who heard him with 
		his sincerity, and he rarely created an enemy.  He was prudent and 
		economical in his personal expenses, but liberal in his charities, and 
		the sufferer never went empty-handed from his door when he had the power 
		to relieve.  Integrity of purpose and a keen sense of honor were 
		conspicuous traits in his character.  The writer of this sketch on one 
		occasion went into his law-office and found him alone and apparently 
		moody and in ill temper; at length he broke out: “I never have felt so 
		humiliated in my life as by an incident that has just occurred.  I 
		cannot restrain myself from speaking of it, and still I should feel 
		disgraced in the opinion of all honest men were it made public.”  He 
		referred to a citizen of intelligence and good standing in the 
		community, saying, “That man has just left my office, and while here he 
		referred to a suit which I am prosecuting against him, indirectly 
		offering me a consideration if I would not press the suit against him.  
		My first impression, ’ said Wade, 
		“was to kick him out of the office; but on reflection, on second 
		thought, I was so humiliated by the proposition that it seemed to me 
		that I had been guilty of some wrong myself.  I asked him what I had 
		ever done, or what he had ever seen or heard of me that led him to 
		suppose it was safe to offer me a bribe to induce treachery to my 
		client.”  Mr. Wade said 
		it was the first time he had ever been approached by any man with such 
		an intimation, and he hoped his character for integrity stood high 
		enough so that it might never be repeated. It probably never occurred 
		again.  And his friends have the satisfaction of knowing that through 
		his long career of public and private duties no man ever impeached his 
		integrity or made a charge of pecuniary wrong against him. 
		
		     Since the foregoing sketch was prepared for publication Mr. Wade has 
		passed away.  The following announcement of his death in the Cleveland 
		Herald, of Mar. 4, 1878, we append, as a just tribute to his memory.
		OBITUARY. 
		EX-SENATOR BENJAMIN F. WADE 
		
		     The Hon. Benjamin Franklin Wade, 
		formerly United States senator from Ohio, died at his home in Jefferson, 
		Ashtabula County, Mar. 2, after an illness of more than four weeks, 
		which he bore with characteristic fortitude.  The news of the death of Mr. Wade, 
		at the ripe age of seventy-eight years, has long been anticipated by the 
		public.  His vigorous constitution gave way slowly to disease, and death 
		came only after a long and painful struggle.  Mr. Wade has 
		for a quarter of a century been a prominent figure in the politics of 
		Ohio, and is among the last of the anti-6lavery pioneers.  Elected to 
		the senate by the Whig party in Ohio, in 1851 after serving two terms in 
		the senate of this State, and as judge of his district, he was twice 
		re-elected, and for eighteen years held a conspicuous position in the 
		councils of the nation.  His fame as a statesman will rest upon his 
		long, earnest, and devoted adherence to the principles of the 
		anti-slavery party in America.  It was during his term of service in the 
		senate that the slavery excitement culminated in civil war, and the 
		north and south met in bloody conflict to decide the issue by an appeal 
		to arms.  From his entrance into the senate he was known as an 
		Abolitionist, and one year after taking his seat voted in favor of the 
		repeal of the fugitive slave law.  On all questions calculated to extend 
		or benefit slavery he was always found bravely and fearlessly in the 
		opposition, and his speeches against the repeal of the Missouri 
		Compromise, the Lecompton constitution for Kansas, the purchasing of 
		Cuba, are all fresh in the memory of our people.  A genuine friend of 
		the laboring man, he advocated for years the passage of the Homestead 
		bill, and had charge of the measure when it passed the senate.  As 
		chairman of the joint committee on the conduct of the war, he urged the 
		most vigorous action on the part of our armies, favored confiscation of 
		the property of leading rebels, and the emancipation of their slaves.  
		He was prominent in compelling the abolition of slavery in the District 
		of Columbia, and in 1862 reported a bill abolishing slavery in all the 
		Territories of the Union or in any that might be acquired.  His 
		connection with the impeachment of President Johnson is 
		well known, and his narrow escape from becoming President familiar to 
		all our readers. 
		     When Mr. Wade entered the senate he was unknown to nearly 
		all its members.  Plain in person and speech, with homespun manners and 
		provincial dress, holding principles abhorrent to nearly all his 
		colleagues, he met with a cold reception, and for a time was almost 
		personally ignored.  He was placed on no committee, and the majority of 
		the senate took small pains to L__gu__ how little sympathy they felt for 
		him or his principles.  But Mr. Wade was naturally a bold, 
		fearless, courageous man, and the efforts to silence his voice and 
		discourage his speech were early met by him with open defiance, and 
		senators soon found he not only was determined to be heard, but had the 
		will and the pluck to assert his rights fearlessly and with manly 
		vigor.  He sought no personal quarrel, nor avoided one by any sacrifice 
		of principle.  It was soon discovered that the plain, unassuming man 
		form Ohio was equal to any emergency, and would prove an ugly customer 
		if forced into a merely personal conflict.  Hence he gained the genuine 
		respect of his opponents, and finally their warm friendship and regard. 
		     Mr. Wade during the years of his public life, was eminently 
		trusted and beloved by the people.  They liked his rugged manner, plain, 
		straightforward, homely speech.  They knew he was earnest, honest, 
		sincere.  His fearless utterances upon the question of human liberty 
		found a ready response in their hearts, and his stirring eloquence upon 
		the stump aroused their enthusiasm and stimulated their real.  Few men 
		could portray the evils of slavery with more effective skill, and his 
		denunciation of the "hellish traffic" in human beings found ready 
		response in the heart of his bearers. 
		     The life of Mr. Wade had been one eminently useful to his 
		country.  From the humblest position, with scanty education, and from 
		the home of poverty, relying upon his own common sense, shrewdness, and 
		practical nature, he rose steadily in the affection and confidence of 
		the people until he became the acting vice-president of the United 
		States.  Mr. Wade was the most earnest and sincere of men in his 
		convictions, and even under the influence of strong emotion had full 
		command of suitable and expressive words, and the power to move his 
		bearers in strains of true and genuine eloquence.  His manners were open 
		and frank, his speech at all times free and unreserved, and the absolute 
		sincerity of the man was stamped in every line of his countenance. 
		
		--------------- 
		* By C. S. Simonds. 
		
		
		  Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 17  | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		Edward Wade | 
      
      
		EDWARD WADE.*  
		The Wades were 
		a tough, hardy, brave, intellectual, strong-fibred folk. One would like 
		to know something of the genesis of the family and the course of their 
		history.  A family of nine by the same parents, of which “Frank” 
		(B. 
		F.) 
		and “Ned” 
		were the youngest, must have been remarkable.  The four elder died 
		between ages of seventy-eight and eighty.  The two survivors are eighty 
		and seventy-eight.  Of the others, one died at fifty-three, one at 
		sixty-three, and one at sixty-nine.*  Thoroughly English in breed, of 
		the average rank, impregnate with the honesty, wholesome virtues, 
		wisdoms, and experiences of the common toiling life, full of vigor and 
		vitality, with a sense of the ludicrous, a germ of grim humor, and a 
		touch of the heroic, combative and tender.  The father, James, 
		was some time a shoemaker, a stout soldier, a daring privateer, and 
		fought as often and as bravely as the eight years War of the Revolution 
		permitted.  The mother, Mary Upham, 
		was the daughter of a Baptist clergyman, Edward 
		Upham, 
		inbred with the religious elements of the denomination, intensified by 
		its persecutions in Massachusetts in colonial times.  Edward, 
		the youngest, was born at Feeding Hills, West Springfield, 
		Massachusetts, Nov. 22, 1802.  He received his grandfather’s name and 
		religious nature.  The family removed to Andover, Ashtabula County, 
		Ohio, in 1821.  He early manifested an ingenious mind, with a tendency 
		for mathematics; and when about twenty-one composed and wrote a new 
		arithmetic, which was burned with a brother-in-law’s house, where it was 
		deposited.  He studied law with Elisha Whittlesey, 
		and after a three years’ thorough course was admitted at Jefferson in 
		1827; was elected justice of the peace in 1831; married the first time 
		in 1832; elected prosecuting attorney in 1833.  He resided a few years 
		at Unionville; removed to Toledo engaged in speculation; went up in the 
		explosion of 1837, though he afterwards paid every dollar.  After the 
		failure he removed to Cleveland, formed a partnership with Woolsey Wells, 
		and later with H. 
		A. Hurlbut.  
		Subsequently he was a member of the firms of Payne, Wilson & Wade, Hitchcock, Wilson & Wade, 
		and Wilson & Wade.  
		He was four times elected to congress from the Cleveland district, 
		serving from 1853 to 1861.  He died at East Cleveland, Ohio, 1866.  Edward Wade had 
		but the scanty opportunity for education found by a boy of the people of 
		his time.  An eager thirst for knowledge, indomitable pluck, a strong, 
		quick intellect, and hopeful spirit enabled him to outstrip the average 
		boys of his neighborhood.  More sanguine than his brother Frank, 
		he induced him to enter upon the law. Few men ever more thoroughly 
		mastered the common law.  He was the best special pleader of his day.  
		His success was slow,—might have discouraged a less determined spirit.  
		His ventures in speculation were a grave hindrance.  Dark and saturnine 
		of face, which to strangers was a little forbidding, to which was added 
		the austerities of religion, and the odium that attached to the name of 
		Abolitionist, which he early acquired, an early lack of fluency, with 
		his often change of residence, conspired to keep him for many years in 
		the background.  Nor was he fortunate in the associates of the two first 
		firms of which he was a member.  Persistent, indomitable, aspiring,—such 
		a man cannot always be repressed.  He laid his foundation deep in 
		thorough learning, and his time came.  He overcame the counties around 
		Cleveland first.  Lawyers who knew him had him employed in difficult 
		cases, and the other side sometimes found themselves beaten by his 
		better law, and they could hardly tell why.  And the shrewd, hard-headed 
		New Englanders came to know that behind the repulsive, cast-iron mask of 
		a face there lay a charm which they saw was potent. He became a leader 
		in Geauga, Lake, Lorain, and visited other counties on important 
		retainers, yet he had no place at the Cleveland bar, where he lived.  
		Finally, Henry 
		B. Payne, 
		one of the ablest lawyers of the State, overworked and in failing 
		health, wanted relief, and Payne & Wilson were 
		supplemented with Wade, 
		and the city was astonished by the revelation which the firm made of 
		him.  With the failing health and gradual diminution of the head, the 
		firm became a legal kangaroo. Upon the retirement of Mr. Payne, Reuben 
		Hitchcock took 
		his place, Mr. Wade content 
		to stand nominally third.  No man perhaps ever cared less where his name 
		stood.  Mr. Hitchcock was 
		then at his best, and second to none as an able and laborious lawyer.  Mr. Wilson did 
		the dignity, suavity, and deportment of the firm.  For several years the 
		house ranked with any in the State.  I have stated the thoroughness of Mr. Wade’s 
		legal training.  On his early foundation he carefully built the 
		ever-growing, ever widening and rising structure, a profound and 
		accomplished lawyer.  Master of the common law, thoroughly versed in 
		chancery, and at home in the narrow range of the laws of crimes, there 
		was not at the bar a more versatile man.  He was also widely read in 
		history, biography, and politics; kept up with the progress of the 
		natural sciences.  He excelled as nisi 
		prius lawyer 
		in the management and trial of cases before a jury.  A master of 
		pleading, with the rules of evidence at his command, knowing and 
		sympathizing with the average mind, the habits of life, and mode of 
		thought of the people of whom he came, he became one of the most 
		formidable opponents to be met with in northern Ohio, whose bar was in 
		no way behind that of any section of the State.  With practice and 
		perseverance he became one of the best and most successful advocates of 
		his region.  The defects and hesitancies that marred his utterance 
		disappeared forever.  He had a copious command of language, a flowing 
		delivery, free, bold action, warmed readily, was intensely earnest, 
		ingenious, and logical.  Nature had given him a fine, strong voice of 
		great power, with the tone of a trumpet in its higher notes.  He was not 
		without fancy, and an abundant, homely humor.  He never overshot the 
		jury.  His illustrations were all drawn from common things,—the kitchen 
		door-yard and barn-yard,—were always apt, often irresistible.  He said a 
		good many things which were repeated.  With his strong, deep, intense 
		nature, kindled to a height which he often attained, his declamation was 
		most impressive, sometimes splendid, and justly called eloquent.  He had 
		much of that magnetic power which seizes the blood and sympathy of an 
		audience, adding effectiveness to an assault which shatters a position 
		found proof against logic and argument.  Combative was he, as lawyers 
		must be, and a masterpiece of will, which is a great force.  Men often 
		carry cases because they will.  Though a man of the quickest and 
		tenderest feelings, he had no pathos and little imagination.  A most 
		unambitious speaker, he never labored for fine effects.  The good things 
		were struck out by the collision of thought, his fire a natural product, 
		and his humor unstudied. 
		
		     Edward Wade was 
		originally a Whig,—made the canvass of 1840 for Harrison.  
		The anti-slavery seed had quick, vigorous, and hardy growth in his deep, 
		rich nature.  He became, soon after the canvass, an avowed, unwavering 
		political Abolitionist.  Thought with him became immediate action.  He 
		was at once the leader and the spokesman of the few despised and 
		persecuted who had the conviction and courage to organize in political 
		opposition to slavery.  At the county-seats where he attended court, at 
		secluded school-houses, whether the audience was few or many, a master 
		of the subject, with labored earnestness he planted with unstinting hand 
		the seed that was so soon to spring up and ripen.  He was the Liberty 
		party candidate for congress, against Mr. Giddings, 
		as long as Cleveland was in the same district.  He canvassed with more 
		labor and care than after the multitude came to act with him.  In 1849, 
		in the triangular contest between the Whigs, Free-Soilers, and 
		Democrats, he was a candidate for the Ohio senate, and defeated by a 
		small plurality.  In 1853, in a similar contest, he was elected to 
		congress against Judge Wilson, 
		his former partner, and William 
		Case.  
		His more famous brother had been four years in the senate when he took 
		his seat in the house. 
		
		     Though the odium which attended the name “Abolitionist” had in a 
		way died out in Mr. Wade’s 
		district, it had not in Washington, and was remembered against him.  The 
		time was past for partisan warfare.  He was one of many, all able and 
		all older men in the house.  He was not favored with any conspicuous 
		place on any important committees, although he served with great credit 
		for four congresses, and retained the undiminished love and confidence 
		of his people to the last.  His early unselfish devotion to truth bore 
		him this endearing fruit. He made several able and telling speeches, but 
		can hardly be said to have gained the ear of the house.  On the 
		committee of commerce he made a masterly and exhaustive report on the 
		commerce of the lakes,—the first upon that subject.  The results which 
		it exhibited were a revelation even to men whose lives, labors, and 
		capital were embarked in it, and gave the author a reputation through 
		the country which should have secured him a better recognition in the 
		house.  Those were the evil days, the breaking up of old political 
		organization, and of the government as well.  Another, and personally 
		to Mr. Wade and 
		his friends a most melancholy factor, is to be taken into the account in 
		estimating the reason why he never reached the position in the house 
		which those who knew him best expected. He certainly did not fall below 
		his brother in ability.  He had a wider reading at that time of their 
		lives, and much more general culture; in manner and address more 
		polished.  He died of a softening of the brain.  How early the shadow of 
		the awfulest of fates, heralding its oncoming, had darkened the high, 
		pure soul, and weakened the faculties of his strong, clear, practical, 
		fervid intellect, no mortal knows.  From things learned at the capital, 
		it must have been some years before his retirement from the house. His 
		career there, compared with the average, was not only most useful but 
		highly honorable.  It saddens me to remember that it fell short of the 
		promise of his powers and abilities as exhibited at the bar and as a 
		political speaker.  Mr. Wade’s 
		first wife was Sarah Louise Atkins, 
		one of the several daughters of Judge 
		Q. F. Atkins, 
		of whom it was said that his face, if 
		
		set on Mason and Dixon’s line, turned to the south, would of itself 
		abolish slavery.  The daughters were all superior women, and it was 
		understood that it was the earnest, personal solicitation of the young 
		lady, preceding marriage, that first effectively called the attention of 
		her lover to the subject of religion.  Mrs. Wade was 
		quite the equal of any of her sisters, and save that the marriage was 
		unblessed with offspring, it was one of rare felicity.  Gifted and 
		cultivated, of rich and varied charities, harmonious in life, united in 
		effort for the various causes of human advancement, especially of the 
		slave and temperance, their house became the asylum of the flying 
		fugitive, as their hands were eager to relieve suffering in all forms.  
		The cause they knew not they searched out.  They adopted two children, 
		offsprings of different parents, a son and daughter, whom they reared 
		with the utmost care.  The son was an early victim of the late war.  The 
		daughter is the accomplished wife of Henry P. 
		Wade, 
		son of B. 
		F. Wade, 
		a gallant young officer late of the regular army.  The first Mrs. 
		Wade died 
		in 1852.  During the early years of Mr. Wade’s 
		congressional services he contracted a second marriage with Miss 
		Mary P. Hall, the 
		accomplished niece of the late Dr. 
		J. P. Kirtland, 
		who survives him.  This marriage was also childless.  The religious 
		element in the nature of this well-endowed man was large and constantly 
		active.  The tone of his mind, although he wrote an arithmetic in youth, 
		had a tendency to the visionary, and for a time he was a believer in the 
		Second Advent.  It was remarked by his opponents, however, that during 
		this period his cases were prepared with the same care and tried with 
		the same consummate skill that marked his entire career at the bar.  In 
		person he was compact, well-made, with an erect carriage, and the same 
		manly and lofty pose of head that characterized his brother Frank.  
		These men, though the least conscious of mortals, could not help 
		carrying themselves as full men.  In repose Edward was 
		grave and thoughtful, with an earnest, almost sad outlook from black 
		eyes, the rather austere, dark face, framed in night-black curly hair, 
		of silky gloss and fineness, and late in life adorned with a full 
		whisker, was ever ready to break into smiles, which lit it up with great 
		winningness.  Of frank and pleasing manner, modest and retiring 
		
		deportment, no man could be more genial and cordial, no man was ever 
		better loved by those who came to know him,—a not difficult 
		acquisition,—and no man had a wider and stronger hold on the popular 
		heart than he finally won.  A more open spirit, a tenderer, braver, 
		purer soul, never found lodging in the frame of man.  A more unselfish, 
		devoted heart never sent warmth through the human form.  A man was he in 
		every fibre of his person, every instinct of his nature, every impulse 
		of his heart.  Brave and blameless, trusted, loved, deplored, compelled 
		to linger above the horizon after his night had set in, the mere body 
		breathing and feeding when the masterful spirit had departed.  The 
		sadness of this fate throws its shadow back over his life, and invests 
		his memory with a regretful 
		
		tenderness. 
		--------------- 
		
		     *Hon. A. G. Riddle.     Written 
		before the death of B. F.
		
		  Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 84  | 
     
    
      | 
        | 
      
      
		HON. JONATHAN WARNER, 
		was born at Chester Parish, in old Saybrook, Connecticut, Dec. 11, 
		1782.  His father, Jonathan, 
		was a farmer, and also owned some interest in vessels engaged at that 
		time in the coasting trade.  The young man was bred principally upon the 
		farm, but had acquired some experience as a sailor upon his father’s 
		vessels, and had at one time made a cruise to the West Indies.  In the 
		fall of 1804, in company with a man named Olmsted, he ventured on an 
		exploring expedition to the western country.  He was provided with a 
		letter of credit, which spoke of him in high terms of praise. 
		
		     At Buffalo they procured a boat, and started upon the lake for New 
		Connecticut, and his nautical experience was of value during a violent 
		storm, which compelled them to run their boat ashore, where they spent a 
		night under its shelter.  They landed at the mouth of Ashtabula creek, 
		and made their way to the interior as far as the present village of 
		Jefferson.  Here Mr. Warner selected 
		lands embracing a part of the present village, while his companion made 
		his settlement in what is now known as the township of Kingsville.  At 
		that time there was but one resident of the township of Jefferson, a man 
		by the name of Mapes, who had previously settled upon a part of the same 
		land, and had built a log house and cleared a few acres.  Mr. Warner purchased 
		his improvements and made provision for a future home, although before 
		locating permanently he went back to Connecticut.  In the spring of 1805 
		he returned, and fixed his permanent residence in Jefferson. 
		
		     In 1806 other settlers came into the township.  Among them came Edward 
		Frethy, 
		with his family, from Washington city.  He was the first postmaster, the 
		first justice of the peace, and the first merchant in Jefferson. 
		
		     Mr. Warner was 
		pleased with the wilderness in which he had located, and which he was 
		making every effort to destroy.  As a matter of choice he had settled in 
		a hermitage far from human habitations, and yet he found it not good to 
		be alone, and on the 4th day of May, 1807, he was married to Nancy, 
		a daughter of Edward Frethy.  
		His residence was three-fourths of a mile distant, and he went for his 
		bride on horseback.  After the ceremony was performed he took her upon 
		the crupper and carried her to his cabin, near the same spot where she 
		now resides, at the advanced age of eighty-nine years, and where she 
		continued the partner of his joys and of his sorrows through his life. 
		
		     The first selection of land made by Mr. Warner embraced 
		the land upon which the court-house was afterwards located; but to 
		accommodate the new village and to secure the county-seat he was induced 
		to exchange a portion of his selection for lands lying farther west and 
		adjoining the proposed town. 
		
		     In the year 1815 he was appointed recorder of deeds for the county, 
		for the term of seven years. In the year 1825 he was appointed treasurer 
		of the county.  Soon after this time the anti- Masonic excitement 
		prevailed in politics, and Mr. Warner was 
		an active leader in the anti-Masonic party.  In the fall of 1831 he was 
		elected a representative to the State legislature, and in the spring of 
		1839 he was elected by the legislature of the State an associate judge 
		of the court of common pleas, for the term of seven years, his term 
		expiring on Apr. 1, 1846.  He was always an active partisan in politics, 
		and always in sympathy with the Democratic party, except during the few 
		years that the anti-Masonic party had a political existence.  He had 
		eleven children, one of whom died in infancy.  Of the ten who reached 
		maturity,—four sons and six daughters,—all but one are now living, and 
		all have families of their own, who now hold respectable positions in 
		society.  George, 
		his second son, was killed by accident, Mar. 25, 1877, in Washington 
		Territory, where he left a wife and two children.  Judge Warner died 
		at his old residence in Jefferson on the 12th day of April, 1862, in his 
		eightieth year, respected and honored by all. 
		
		     He was a vigorous man, possessed of a strong will, a kind heart, 
		and affectionate disposition.  He was a valuable citizen, exact and 
		trustworthy in all his dealings, as well in public as in private life. 
		And as one of the pioneers of the county, who has helped to found and 
		build up its institutions, his life and character are worthy of 
		commemoration by the present as well as by the future generations of 
		this county who may follow after him. 
		
		  Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 115 | 
     
    
      | 
        | 
      
      
		CAPTAIN 
		JOHN B. WATROUS, second 
		son of John 
		and Roxanna Watrous, 
		was born at Saybrook, Connecticut, Jan. 15, 1790.  When seventeen years 
		of age, he made the journey to Ashtabula, Ohio, on horseback, and bought 
		the farm on which he afterwards resided, now known as “ Maple Grove.”  
		He returned to Connecticut, and remained there until 1810, when, with 
		his parents and family, he removed permanently to his wilderness home.  
		The journey was performed by means of ox-teams, —two yoke of oxen to 
		each wagon.  A log dwelling was soon erected, which quickly became a 
		centre of graceful hospitalities to a large circle of genial friends.  John 
		B. was 
		a soldier in the War of 1812, as were also two of his brothers.  He was 
		a prominent member of the Masonic fraternity, one of the first workers 
		for the establishment of an Episcopal church in Ashtabula, and a 
		director in the “Warren and Ashtabula Turnpike Company,” then considered 
		a road of great importance to the country.  His tastes were literary, 
		and to a polished exterior he added the graces of a Christian 
		character.  His was a nature dispensing sunshine wherever he moved.  
		Married at thirty-three years of age to a beautiful woman much his 
		junior, he was a tender husband and judicious parent.  He died in ripe 
		old age, Feb. 24, 1869.  His wife, Julia Montgomery, 
		was born in Conneaut, Dec. 14, 1806.  She was the youngest daughter of James 
		Montgomery (who 
		was the son of Robert 
		Montgomery), 
		and was born in Schoharie, New York. Robert Montgomery had emigrated 
		from the north of Ireland, had been a soldier of the Revolution, and was 
		a cousin-german of the Robert Montgomery who 
		fell at Quebec. 
		
		     James Montgomery had 
		married Mary Baldwin, 
		of Catskill, New York.  The pair became pioneers of Conneaut, Ashtabula 
		County, having removed there three years after the first settlement of 
		Harpersfield.  The journey from Buffalo was made in open boats, the 
		intervening country being but a trackless forest.  The parents and their 
		four children disembarked at night, sleeping on the beach beneath their 
		sheltering boats.  Arrived at Conneaut, a dwelling was hastily 
		constructed from the barks of trees, until a more substantial one of 
		logs could be made; and this speedily became “a tavern,” for the 
		accommodation of people emigrating still farther towards the setting 
		sun. 
		
		     The husband followed the business of boating between Conneaut and 
		Erie, thus supplying the infant colony with provisions and other 
		necessaries of life.  He served for a time in the War of 1812, and later 
		served for two successive terms in the legislature at Chillicothe, then 
		the seat of government for the State. 
		
		     Four more children were born to them in Conneaut, and when Julia was 
		four years of age the Watrous family, 
		then on their way to Ashtabula, stayed overnight at this inn, and then 
		and there began the acquaintance which culminated in the marriage of John 
		B. Watrous and Julia 
		Montgomery on 
		the 23d of June, 1823. 
		
		     James 
		Montgomery removed 
		to Austinburg in 1813, and here soon after was born his son, Colonel 
		James Montgomery, 
		of Kansas celebrity,—the famed “ guerrilla chieftain,” the “ fighting 
		preacher.”  Colonel Montgomery also 
		commanded the Union army in Florida during the “ late unpleasantness.”  
		He died at Mound City, Kansas, in 1872. 
		
		     James 
		Montgomery, Sr., 
		died at Ashtabula in 1834, and Mrs. 
		Julia Montgomery Watrous is 
		now the sole survivor of her father’s family. 
		
		
		----- Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 144 | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		E. M. Webster
		
		  
		Residence of 
		Dr. E. M. Webster, 
		Kingsville,  
		Ashtabula Co., O 
		 | 
      
      
		E. M. WEBSTER, M. D., 
		was born in the township where he now resides, on the 21st day of May, 
		1827.  His parents were Hiram 
		Hall and Corinna L. Webster.  
		He received an academic education, and, on its completion, read medicine 
		with his father, and graduated at Hudson medical college, Cleveland, 
		Ohio, receiving his degree Feb. 22, 1854.  Has practiced medicine with 
		eminent success until this time, except a brief period passed at 
		Philadelphia, as follows: in 1862 he was mustered into the United States 
		army as an assistant-surgeon, and assigned to duty as post-surgeon at 
		that point.  His brother, who was with the army, died soon after, when 
		the doctor resigned his commission and came home.  He has been physician 
		for the county infirmary for the past fifteen years.  Dr. Webster was 
		married to Miss 
		Emily A. Beckwith, 
		June 4, 1851.  Have had two children. Darwin 
		P. was 
		born June 28, 1852; died in infancy.  George 
		E. was 
		born July 25, 1858.  The doctor is thoroughly Republican in politics; is 
		a member of the Presbyterian church; is a Knight Templar, and affiliates 
		with Cache commandery, No. 27, at Conneaut. 
		
		
		----- Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page127 | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		H. H. Webster | 
      
      
		DR. HIRAM WEBSTER was 
		born in Lanesborough, Berkshire county, Massachusetts, on May 17, 1800.  
		He is the second child of Clark 
		and Naamah Hall Webster.  
		When he was five year of age his parents removed to Franklin, Delaware 
		county, New York.  After two years passed at this point his father made 
		a trip to "New Connecticut," as the Western Reserve was then called, and 
		without making a purchase of land put in a piece of wheat on the 
		Ashtabula flats.  This land was owned by Matthew Hubbard.  
		Returning to Franklin for his family, he soon started for Ohio, 
		calculating to reach Buffalo on runners.  At Skaneateles he found two 
		families named Pratt and Bartlett also 
		en-route for the "promised land," and in company with them proceeded 
		onward and in due time arrived at Black Rock, where they found a large 
		open boat, which was offered them at a low price, as it had become 
		unseaworthy,—indeed was almost a wreck.  However, an arrangement was 
		effected whereby Mr. Webster repaired 
		the boat, and in return was given a passage for his family and goods to 
		Ashtabula Landing.  It was not altogether a safe voyage, as not one of 
		the company was acquainted with handling a boat except Mr. Webster.  
		The motive power was oars and setting-poles, aided by extemporized sails 
		of bed blankets and sheets.  There were twenty-one on board at night the 
		boat was beached and made fast, the greater portion of the passengers 
		going ashore to sleep.  An incident is related in which the subject of 
		this sketch was an active participant.  He and a younger brother were 
		sleeping on the boat in company with several other persons; about 
		midnight he was shaken quite roughly by an old lady of the party, and 
		ordered to get off the boat quickly, as it was sinking.  In the dense 
		darkness he was unable to find his brother, and while groping about in 
		search of him doubtless got in the way of the said female; be that as it 
		may, the result was a sudden push and an equally sudden plunge into the 
		lake being near the bow, however, the water was not deep, yet before 
		getting out his feet and his head became submerged, and he “shipped” 
		considerable water.  Reaching Ashtabula, tarried there until June, 1809, 
		when the family removed to Kingsville and made a permanent settlement.  
		In the twenty-first year of his age, Hiram 
		Hall Webster commenced 
		the study of medicine, and in 1825 entered upon the practice of his 
		profession, and diligently pursued it until his son, Dr. 
		E. M., 
		was qualified to take the labors upon himself, when the doctor left the 
		field.  Those years of pioneer practice were fraught with hardship and 
		often danger. 
		
		     Dr. Webster was 
		united in marriage, in April, 1824, to Corinna Lucinda, 
		daughter of Russel 
		and Corinna Loomis, 
		of Windsor township, this county.  The fruits of this union are Corinna 
		Naamah, 
		born Mar. 10, 1825, married Rev. 
		E. C. Williams (deceased); Eleazur 
		Michael, 
		born May 21, 1827; Laura 
		Ann, 
		born July 8, 1829, died in infancy; Ann Eliza, 
		born Dec. 14, 1830, married Darwin 
		P. Venen, 
		and is deceased; Clarinda 
		L., 
		born Aug. 19, 1833, married D. 
		P. Venen; Charles Hiram, 
		born July 21, 1836; and Henry Clark, 
		the youngest, who was born Feb. 11, 1842, was a soldier of the Union 
		army, and died at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Oct. 8, 1862.  The wife 
		of Dr. Webster is 
		likewise deceased, since which time he has resided with his son, Dr. E. 
		M.   Dr. 
		Webster, senior, 
		is a worthy member of the fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons, and a 
		Republican in politics.   
		
		----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations 
		and Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by 
		Publ. Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 127 | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		Hon. Horace Wilder | 
      
      
		HON. HORACE WILDER, 
		one of several sons of a farmer of limited means, was born upon a spur 
		of the "Berkshire hills" in West Hartland, Connecticut, Aug. 20, A. D. 
		1802.  In 1819 he entered, and in the class of 1823 graduated, at Yale 
		college with honor.  He almost immediately entered as a law-student the 
		office of the Hon. Elisha Phelps, 
		of Simsbury, Connecticut, where he pursued the study of his profession 
		until the spring of 1824, when he went to Virginia, and for about two 
		and a half years was there employed in teaching a “family” school in the 
		family and upon the plantation of Mrs. Morton, 
		of Stafford county.  It is believed that the Hon. 
		James A. Seddon, secretary 
		of war of the Confederate States, was one of his pupils.  During this 
		period he devoted his leisure hours to the study of the aw, books being 
		procured for him at an office in Fredericksburg.  In January, 1826 he 
		was “ licensed” to practice in the courts of Virginia, but in the fall 
		of that year he returned to Hartland, where he remained during the 
		winter, and in the spring of 1827 left for Ohio, where he had determined 
		to make his future home.  His first point was Claridon, Geauga county, 
		at which place he had a sister (Mrs. 
		Judge Taylor) 
		residing.  Shortly before this, Edson Wheeler, Esq., 
		of East Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, a lawyer of character and 
		influence, had deceased; and, after inquiry and consultation with 
		members of the bar in the vicinity, Mr. Wilder located 
		at that place.  Never having “practiced,” by the law of the State he was 
		compelled to wait a year before admission. 
		
		     At the August (1828) term of the superior court in Geauga county he 
		was duly admitted to the bar, in the mean time doing his professional 
		business in the name of a friend.  In October, 1833, he was elected 
		prosecuting attorney of Ashtabula County, and in the fall of 1834 was 
		elected representative to the State legislature,—the only office of a 
		political character ever held by him.  In 1837 he removed to Conneaut.  
		In 1833 he married Phebe 
		J. Coleman, 
		the eldest daughter of the late Elijah 
		Coleman, M.D., 
		well known to all the residents of the county of the past generation.  Mrs. Wilder died 
		in 1847. He never re-married.  Mr. 
		Wilder, 
		during the entire period of his active life, devoted himself exclusively 
		to his books and professional duties, turning neither to the right hand 
		nor to the left, and at a comparatively early day earned for himself an 
		enviable reputation as a sound and skillful lawyer, a safe and prudent 
		counselor, and an honest and honorable man.  In 1855 he was elected 
		judge of the court of common pleas for the third subdivision of the 
		ninth judicial district (composed of the counties of Ashtabula, Lake, 
		and Geauga), to fill the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Judge 
		R. Hitchcock, 
		and in 1856 was again elected to the same position for the full term of 
		five years. 
		
		     In 1862, soon after his term expired, Judge Wilder was 
		appointed by the late Governor Tod draft 
		commissioner for the county of Ashtabula, and as such superintended and 
		conducted the first draft of troops made in the county. 
		
		     In the spring of 1S63 he removed to Ashtabula and formed a 
		copartnership, in the practice of the law. with E. 
		H. Fitch, Esq., 
		under the name of Wilder & Fitch. 
		This business arrangement was of but brief duration, for, in December, 
		1863, Judge Wilder was 
		appointed by Governor Tod a 
		judge of the supreme court, to fill the vacancy created by the 
		resignation of Judge Gholson, 
		and in the fall of 1864 was elected to the same position for the balance 
		of Judge Gholson’s term. 
		
		     In 1865, Judge Wilder resumed 
		practice at Ashtabula. In May, 1867, he retired from active business and 
		removed to Red Wing, Minnesota, where he has since resided with and as 
		part of the family of his younger brother, E. 
		T. Wilder, 
		between whom, even for brothers, very intimate relations have always 
		existed. 
		
		     In politics, Judge Wilder was 
		a Whig so long as the Whig party existed.  After it disappeared he 
		affiliated with the Republican party until some years subsequent to the 
		close of the war, when, dissatisfied with the policy of that party 
		towards the south, he has since been more nearly in harmony with the 
		Democratic party, though not fully identified with it.  
		
		     In early life Judge Wilder was. 
		in religious matters, inclined to adopt views not in all respects deemed 
		orthodox, but in later years these opinions have been entirely changed, 
		and he now is and for some years has been a communicant of the 
		Protestant Episcopal church. 
		
		     His decisions from the bench are enduring testimonials to his 
		familiarity with the law and to the accuracy of his legal acquirements. 
		Both his natural and acquired ability peculiarly fitted him for the 
		duties of a judge.  In scholarship thorough, in judgment sound, his 
		knowledge of the law extensive, and its exactness unquestioned, in 
		character irreproachable, and to business scrupulously attentive, he was 
		a jurist who honored the position he filled. 
		
		     During his long residence in Ashtabula County he gained the warm 
		friendship of a large circle of acquaintances, by whom he is still 
		remembered with strong affection. 
		
		----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations 
		and Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by 
		Publ. Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 89 | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		Res. of 
		
		Geo. Willard, 
		
		Ashtabula, 
		
		Ashtabula Co., O
		
		  
		George Willard 
		Mrs. George Willard 
		-- 
		Interior View of 
		George Willard's 
		Drug Store 
		-- 
		Willard Block 
		George Willard, 
		Proprietor 
		Ashtabula, OH 
		 
		
		  
		Willard Block 
		as of the year 2020 
  | 
      
      
		Ashtabula 
		- 
		
		GEORGE WILLARD was 
		born in Holland patent, New York, on the 12th day of August, 1812, and 
		is the fifth of a family of twelve children born to Simon 
		and Rhoda Wills Willard, 
		originally of Weathersfield, Connecticut, but who removed in 1804 to 
		Holland patent, where they remained until 1834, at which date they came 
		to Ashtabula township.   There the parents died,—the mother January 21, 
		1842, and the lather November 18, 1850.  Of the brothers and sisters of George 
		Willard, 
		all are dead except one, the oldest brother, William, 
		who is still a resident of Ashtabula.  The education of Mr. Willard was 
		acquired through the medium of our American system of common schools, 
		after the completion of which he began what has proved to be the 
		occupation of his life, that of merchandising, making his debut, in 
		1828, as clerk in a general store and forwarding and commission house, 
		at Whitestown, Oneida county, New York.  The Erie canal was then in its 
		palmiest days.  Remained here, engaged in this avocation, until 1831, 
		when he came to Ashtabula, Ohio, and for the succeeding five years was 
		clerk in the post-office and store of A. 
		C. Hubbard.  
		In April, 1836, Mr. Willard associated 
		himself with Richard Roberts, 
		and, under the firm-name of Roberts 
		& Willard, 
		opened, in the north half of the double two-story brick block built by H. 
		J. Rees, 
		a stock of goods, consisting of drugs, medicines, groceries, hardware, 
		nails, and iron.  This firm continued in business only about six months, 
		when the death of Mr. Roberts occurred.  
		From this time until 1844, Mr. Willard conducted 
		the business in his own name.  He, however, rented the south half of the 
		building, and put in a dry goods stock.  In 1844 the firm was changed to 
		that of George Willard & 
		Co., by the admission of S. 
		B. Wells, Esq., a 
		former clerk, as a partner.  General produce became a feature of the 
		business at this time.  In the year 1850 the firm was again changed, by 
		the admission of another clerk (Henry Griswold), 
		to Willard, Wells & 
		Co.  In 1855, Messrs. Wells and Griswold withdrew.  
		Since this time Mr. Willard has 
		been the sole proprietor.  The fine three-story brick block which he now 
		occupies was erected in 1874.  The first real estate purchased by Mr. Willard in 
		this township was the lot upon which stands his present business block.  
		This was in the year 1838, and the subsequent year he purchased the 
		property now occupied by William Willard.  Mr. George Willard has 
		been engaged in the mercantile business in this city for forty-two 
		years, in addition to five years’ service in the same occupation as 
		clerk.  During this time has been quite largely engaged in lake 
		commerce.  Had a controlling interest, in whole or in part, in the 
		following vessels, viz., schooners “ B. F. Wade,”  “Boston,” 
		“ Julia Willard,” “ York State,” and the bark “ Naomi.”  Has served as 
		mayor one term, and member of the common council of the “ incorporated 
		village of Ashtabula” for several terms.  Has also been township 
		trustee.  Has been one of the directors of the Farmers’ National bank 
		from its organization.  Was director and president of the Ashtabula 
		County Central plank-road company for a number of years.   This road was 
		constructed some time prior to the opening of the Franklin division of 
		the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern railroad, and extended from 
		Ashtabula Harbor to the village of Jefferson, and thence on to the 
		lumber region in Richmond township.  This road was for its time a great 
		convenience. Politically, Mr. Willard is 
		ardently Republican. 
		
		     On the 15th day of September, 1833, he was united in marriage to Julia Francis, 
		daughter of Err 
		W. and Sarah Slawson Mead, 
		who were living at the time in Ashtabula.  No children have blest this 
		union.  He is a member of the Episcopal church.  Mr. Willard served 
		as a member of the vestry and treasurer several years, and as senior 
		warden some twenty years.  Thus have we briefly sketched the life of one 
		of Ashtabula’s representative business men.  The pioneer in trade, he 
		has grown gray in its prosecution.  As a business man, he has been 
		longer in service than any other citizen of Ashtabula.  He has ever 
		proven himself a useful and public-spirited citizen.  The best interests 
		of his village and of his county and of his church he has always 
		zealously striven to promote.  Quiet and unassuming, he is nevertheless 
		an influential citizen, and universally esteemed for his many sterling 
		qualities.  The name of George Willard will 
		not be forgotten when in coming years other generations shall be the 
		denizens of this beautiful village. 
		  Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 144 | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		H. B. Woodbury | 
      
      
		HON. 
		HAMILTON BLOSS WOODBURY is 
		the eldest of a family of six children.  His parents were Ebenezer B. 
		Woodbury, who was born in New Hampshire, and removed to Ohio in 
		1811, and Sylva Woodbury, born in Cazenovia, Madison county, New 
		York, and came to Ohio in 1816.  They were living in Kelloggsville, this 
		county, when the subject of this sketch was born Nov. 27, 1831.  They, 
		however, removed to Jefferson after a term of years, and the mother is 
		yet a resident of that village, the father having died Aug. 14, 1870.  Judge Woodbury was 
		educated in the common and select schools of Ashtabula County.  When 
		seventeen years of age he entered the law office of his father at 
		Kelloggsville, and began the study of the profession in which to-day he 
		occupies a high position.  In the year 1852, at the September term of 
		the district court of Ashtabula county, he was admitted to practice.  
		Some twelve years since, he was admitted to practice in the United 
		States courts.  In 1854 he was elected a justice of the peace for the 
		township of Monroe, this county, and re-elected in 1857.  In October of 
		that year he removed to Jefferson, where he still resides.  Has held 
		numerous offices; among these we may mention trustee of the township and 
		mayor of the village.  In April, 1873, he was elected a delegate to the 
		constitutional convention of Ohio.  He now occupies the position of 
		common pleas judge of the third subdivision of the ninth judicial 
		district of Ohio, having been elected in January, 1875, and again 
		re-elected in October of the same year.  On the 5th of September, 1863, 
		he was by his excellency Governor David Tod commissioned 
		as lieutenant-colonel of the Second Regiment Ohio Volunteer Militia, 
		which position he held until the disbanding of the organization. 
		     The wife of Judge Woodbury was Mary E., daughter of Peter 
		and Sarah W. Hervey, to whom he was united in marriage at Jefferson, 
		Ohio, on the 12th day of October, 1854. 
		     Four children have blessed this union.  They are Frederick H., 
		born Oct. 24, 1855; M. Jennie, born Sept. 10, 1857; Hamilton 
		B., born Dec. 17, 1867; and Walter W., whose birth occurred 
		June 19, 1871.  Politically Judge Woodbury is a Republican.  As a 
		jurist it is perhaps correct to say that no sounder one is known to the 
		courts of northern Ohio.  Conversant with the law, his decisions are 
		rarely called in question, and he presides over the tribunals of justice 
		with dignity and firmness. 
		
		----- Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 91 
		NOTE:  See additional 
		
		biography 
		in Biographical History of Northeastern Ohio publ. 1893.  | 
     
    
      
      
		  
		
		Ephm T. Woodruff | 
      
      Wayne Twp. - 
		REV. EPHRAIM TREADWELL WOODRUFF 
		was born at Farmington, Connecticut, Oct. 17, 1777, and was the youngest 
		son of Timothy Woodruff, by his first wife, Lucy Treadwell, 
		sister of John Treadwell, one of the governors of Connecticut.  
		He graduated at Yale college in 1797.  Rev. James Murdock, 
		who, in 1848, wrote a work entitled "Brief Memoirs of the Class of 
		1797," says in his preface to that work: "The Class of 1797 is 
		distinguished for the longevity of its members, twenty-four out of 
		thirty-seven, or about two-thirds of all that graduated, being alive 
		after a separation of half a century."  He also says: "It was 
		distinguished for the uniform good scholarship of its members."  
		Among its graduates are such well-known names as Henry Baldwin, 
		judge of the United States supreme court; Lyman Beecher, D.D.; 
		Judge Thomas Day, official reporter of the supreme court of 
		Connecticut; and Horatio Seymour, Sr.  Mr. Woodruff, after 
		finishing his theological course as the pupil of Rev. Charles Backus, 
		D. D., of Somers, Connecticut, and teaching the academy at Stonington 
		one year, was ordained pastor of the church in North Coventry, Tolland 
		county, Connecticut.  His health failed him in 1817 so much that he 
		resigned his pastoral charge, and he took a commission from the 
		Missionary society of Connecticut to labor on the "Connecticut Western 
		Reserve in Ohio."  He, however, stopped for one year at Little 
		Falls, Herkimer county, New York, and taught an academy.  He 
		arrived in Wayne, Ashtabula County, in April, 1819, and became the first 
		pastor of the church, settling upon a tract of land which he purchased 
		from Issacher Jones, of Connecticut, all heavily timbered, and 
		upon which the sound of the woodman's axe had not been heard; but with 
		the generous aid of such stout hands and hearts as were possessed by 
		Nathaniel Coleman, Samuel Tuttle, Jonathan Tuttle, Norman Wilcox, Joseph 
		Ford, Deacon Ezra Leonard, Samuel Jones, Deacon Calvin Andrews, Simon 
		Fobes, Titus Hayes, Elisha Giddings, and Joseph Giddings, he 
		soon erected a log house, in which his family, consisting of his wife 
		and sister and six children, were made as comfortable as any of his 
		congregation.  He preached one-half of his time in Wayne, while the 
		remainder was spent in missionary work and in the distribution of Bibles 
		all through the wilderness for more than fifty miles in every direction 
		from his home.  On that same spot he died, on the twenty-sixth day 
		of November, 1859, at the age of eighty-two years.  On his 
		death-bed, being in great pain, he said to his youngest son: "This is a 
		rough road to travel, but its roughness has elevated spots, from which I 
		see 'the city' beyond." 
     Mr. Woodruff was married Oct. 7, 1801, to 
		Sally Alden, orphan daughter of Jonathan Alden, a lineal 
		descendant of John Alden, the pilgrim of Plymouth Rock of that 
		name.  She died in 1829.  In 1832 he married Susan Porter.  
		He had no children by his second wife.  His oldest daughter, born 
		in 1804, was the wife of Hon. Seth Hayes, of Hartford, Trumbull 
		county.  She died in 1850.  Phoebe married Dr. T. J. 
		Kellogg, of Girard, Erie county, Pennsylvania.  Jonathan 
		Alden, a graduate of Hamilton college, and Presbyterian minister, 
		died Sept. 12, 1876, at Imlay City, Michigan.  Harriet died 
		in 1828, at the age of eighteen years.  Charlotte Maria, who 
		married J. B. Clark, of Kelloggsville, Ashtabula County, removed 
		to Michigan, and died in 1871.  Samuel Ebenezer, born Mar. 
		31, 1817, is an attorney-at-law, and with his son, Thomas S.., 
		constitutes the firm of S. E. & T. S. Woodruff, attorneys-at-law, 
		Erie, Pennsylvania, and in which county the senior partner of the firm 
		has practiced his profession for thirty-four years. 
     The first meeting house in Wayne was erected in 1816.  
		A grave-yard was opened upon the tract of land purchased, as before 
		mentioned, by Mr. Woodruff.  The meeting house was in 
		dimensions twenty-eight by thirty-six feet, built of legs hewn only on 
		the inside.  A heard pulpit, ascended by five steps, stood at the 
		north end; a singers' gallery, six steps high, of the same material, 
		extended across the south end, with wings about ten feet along the east 
		and west sides.  A hearth of rough cobble-stones, about six feet 
		square, in the centre of the building, without either chimney or 
		stove-pipe, was the only fires-place previous to 1825.  At first 
		most of the seats were slabs without backs; but they were crowded with 
		true, faithful worshipers every Sabbath-day.  They were not of the 
		fair-weather kind.  At the right of the pulpit sat the elder 
		Deacon Leonard.  He generally selected and read the hymns; he 
		was a noble man, six feet in height, with flowing white hair, knee- and 
		shoe-buckles, faultlessly clean, white bosom, rich, sonorous voice, and 
		one of the best of readers.  In the west wing of the gallery 
		Elisha Giddings was the leading bass singer; in the centre, 
		Captain Levi Leonard let the tenor, assisted by his nephew, 
		Marvin Leonard, son of the deacon, and who, some time after the 
		death of his father, which occurred in 1929, became a deacon of the 
		church.  Linus H. Jones was one of the prominent members of 
		the choir, composed of about twenty persons.  The music was of a 
		high order, on account of the heart and soul it possessed.  This 
		meetinghouse stood on the identical spot where the Rev. George 
		Roberts, a subsequent pastor, lived immediately before his death.  
		It was burned down about the year 1929.  This church was highly 
		prosperous, and its membership was increased to more than  two 
		hundred. 
     The chief obstacle to Mr. Woodruff's usefulness 
		as a pastor was the bronchial complaint that had compelled him to leave 
		Coventry.  This affected his utterance so much as to make it 
		difficult at times to be heard by a large audience; yet, it is doubtful 
		if his efficiency and usefulness as a pastor were much affected for many 
		years, yet it detracted somewhat from his popularity as an orator, 
		though his success and reputation as such fully sustained the character 
		ascribed to him by an eastern cotemporary.  "He was an excellent 
		pastor."  He continued in the pastoral relation of the original 
		church until about 1835, when the infirmities of age, and the consequent 
		failure of his vocal powers and hearing, induced him to resign, and 
		attend church as a listener, often standing in a leaning position upon 
		the front of the pulpit, so that his dull ears might not fail to catch 
		each word that fell from the lips of the speaker.  In a letter to 
		his son Samuel, dated Dec. 7, 1856, he says: "On the Lord's-day I 
		get out with my family, without fail, and attend to my Bible-class of 
		aged members, who gather together with great regularity, with the 
		simplicity of little children, to receive instruction.  I wait upon 
		them with great delight."  In further addressing his son in regard 
		to his hope, confidence, and appreciation of the great refuge, as he was 
		nearing the end of his days upon earth, in closing, he says: 
 
		
			
				“If thou, my Jesus, still art nigh, 
				  Cheerful I live, and cheerful die 
				  When mortal comforts flee. 
				  To find ten thousand worlds in Thee. 
				 
				“Great King of Grace, my heart subdue 
				  I would be led in triumph too, 
				  A willing captive to my Lord, 
				  And sing the triumphs of His word.” | 
			 
		 
		     Among the former 
		residents of the township of Wayne no family is more kindly remembered 
		or associated with stronger ties of friendship and appreciation, than 
		that of Ephraim T. Woodruff. 
		
		
		----- Source: 
		1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and 
		Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. 
		Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Pages 248-249  
		 | 
     
    
      | 
        | 
      
      
		Kingsville 
		Twp. - 
		
		MARSHALL WILLIAM WRIGHT, 
		INFIRMARY DIRECTOR, a fine portrait of whom appears in connection with 
		the sketch of the county infirmary, was born on the 27th day of August, 
		1818, and is a child of Sherman 
		and Fanny Howes Wright, originally 
		of Wilbraham, Hampden county, Massachusetts, but who removed to Ohio and 
		located in the township of Conneaut in the fall of 1811, where they 
		resided until their decease, which occurred—the father's on Jan. 3, 
		1847, and the mother’s Jan. 15, 1872. The education of Mr. Wright was 
		received at a common district school, principally at the school-house on 
		the south ridge in Conneaut.  His time was divided between labor in his 
		father’s tannery and shoe-shop, and the tilling of the small farm owned 
		by him, until his failure in business in 184S, since which time he has 
		served his township and the county in the discharge of various public 
		trusts.  He was first elected a justice of the peace in 1851, and since 
		that date has been an incumbent of that office some thirteen years, and 
		still administers justice to those who are unfortunately compelled to 
		resort to the law to settle their differences.  In the year 1853 he was 
		elected to the office of sheriff of Ashtabula County, and served two 
		terms, and in 1868 was elected county commissioner, and continued in 
		office one term of three years; was elected to his present position as 
		infirmary director in the fall of 1877.  He has also served as trustee 
		of his township several terms, and for the greater portion of the time 
		since attaining his majority has filled the office of school director. 
		
		     On the 1st of August, 1862, he entered the volunteer service of the 
		United States in the capacity of quartermaster of the One Hundred and 
		Fifth Regiment Ohio Volunteer Infantry; served until April, 1864, at 
		which time he was compelled by failing health to resign.  In reply to 
		the question, “Were you wounded ?” he answered, "Once only, when at home 
		on leave of absence in 1863, by a friend congratulating me on the 
		position I held in the service, which would give me an opportunity 
		to make money" 
		
		     On the 27th day of March, 1844, Esquire Wright was 
		united in marriage to Miss Sarah Wayland, 
		daughter of the Rev. Asa and Sarah Saxton Jacobs, 
		of Conneaut (this county).  The children of this marriage are Elizabeth, 
		born Feb. 9, 1845; married Levi 
		T. Scofield, 
		and now resides in Cleveland, Ohio.  Lydia, 
		born Mar. 20, 1847; married Conrad 
		J. Brown; 
		residence, Erie, Pennsylvania.  Altie, 
		born Apr. 23, 1850; married the Rev. 
		Jeremiah Phillips, Jr., 
		and whose home is now in Kenosha county, Wisconsin. Sherman, the next 
		child, was born September 29, 1854; and Nellie, the last, whose birth 
		occurred on Jan. 8, 1859. 
		
		     The ’squire was from the outset a Liberty-party man, and is, as a 
		matter of course, at this writing a Republican, and believes that one 
		hundred cents should make a dollar.  He is a member of Kingsville post, 
		Grand Army of the Republic, and his religious belief is in keeping with 
		the tenets of the Free-Will Baptist church, of which he is a member.  We 
		cannot perhaps better close this sketch than by quoting from the notes 
		of the gentleman himself:  "Have thus far lived on my own resources; 
		none of my family have as yet been charged with crime, have became a 
		public charge or a member of congress." 
		
		----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula 
		County, Ohio with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of its 
		Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. Philadelphia - Williams 
		Brothers - 1878 - Page 208 | 
     
    
      | 
        | 
      
      
		Conneaut 
		Twp. - 
		
		REV. ORRIN T. WYMAN.  
		This gentleman was born at Millville, Orleans county, New York, Aug. 25, 
		1836.  His parents, who were natives of New England, were Oliver 
		and Emily Wyman.  
		The mother is yet living; the father died in 1861.  The education of 
		the Rev. 
		Mr. Wyman was 
		academic.  In 1855, feeling the need of a better preparation for the 
		ministry, he, in September, entered “ Meadville Theological School” for 
		one year, then became a pupil of Antioch college (Yellow Springs, 
		Ohio).  Sickness obliged him to leave this school after two mouths.  
		September, 1857, returned to Meadville, Pennsylvania, completed a 
		three-years’ course, and graduated June, 1859. About Oct. 1, 1854, he 
		left home with an uncle—Rev. 
		S. H. Morse, 
		evangelist—to assist in revival meetings in Chautauqua county, New 
		York.  Preached his first sermon at Fluvanna, New York, Jan. 14, 1855.  
		After leaving school continued his studies, and supplied churches at 
		different points in Orleans and Chautauqua counties.  Was ordained at a 
		special session of Erie Christian conference, called for that purpose at 
		De Wittville, New York.  June, 1862, and on the 15th of same month 
		delivered his first sermon in the Christian church at Conneaut, Ohio.  
		The membership, when he became pastor of this church, was not numerous, 
		but during the sixteen years he has been in charge, he has raised its 
		membership to two hundred and fifty, and has thoroughly repaired the 
		church edifice.  His labors have certainly been crowned with merited 
		success.  He is a strong advocate of temperance, and a member of the 
		Independent Order of Good Templars and Royal Templars of Temperance. In 
		politics, Republican.  He is also president of the Erie Christian 
		conference, and a trustee of “ Christian Biblical Institute,” at 
		Stanfordville, New York. 
		
		     On the 7th of September, 1859, he was united in marriage to Miss 
		T. V., 
		daughter of Newell 
		and Lucy Putnam, 
		also natives of the New England States.  This estimable lady received an 
		academic education, and was a teacher for several terms.  She is also a 
		member of the Christian church. 
		
		     But one child has blessed this union, Benson N., whose birth 
		occurred on June 17, 1863. 
		----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with 
		Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most 
		Prominent Men by Publ. Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 
		169 | 
     
     
  
 
NOTES: 
 
	   
       |