1878 History
of
Ashtabula Co., Ohio
with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of its' Pioneers and Most
Prominent Men. Philadelphia Williams Brothers 1878 256 pgs.
ALSO NOTE: I will transcribe biographies upon request. Please
state the County and State in the Subject line of the email. ~ SW
BIOGRAPHIES
< CLICK HERE to GO to
1878 BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX >
< CLICK HERE to GO to LIST of TABLES
of CONTENTS and BIOGRAPHICAL INDEXES >
Residence of
Hon. Benjamin F. Wade,
Jefferson, Ohio
B. F. Wade
|
Jefferson Twp. -
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN WADE.
In West Springfield, Massachusetts, there is a region abounding in
beautiful but rugged hills, whose slopes in the early days were devoted
to the pasturage of herds and flocks; and from that circumstance it was
called "Feeding Hills Parish." Here the subject of this sketch was
born. He commenced with the century, Oct. 27, 1800. The present
generation have but a faint conception of the condition of the country
and the hardships endured by that people in those times. His father, James
Wade,
had been a soldier of the Revolution, and the events of that period had
deprived him of the means of supporting a large family and giving them
more than the ordinary education afforded by the common schools.
Work was the rule; schools were few and beyond the reach of many;
children were compelled to share the privations and toil of their
seniors. Frank,
for so he was then and through all his earlier years familiarly called,
lost no opportunity of making himself acquainted with all the books that
came with his reach. Hence, when he arrived at maturity he had acquired
a fund of historical and general information far superior to many who
had enjoyed all the advantages of a higher classical education. In the
fall of 1821, James
Wade and
his family removed to Andover, in the county of Ashtabula, Ohio. Here Frank was
for two years employed in clearing land and with the ordinary work of a
farm during the summer, and in the winter as a teacher of common
schools.
In the fall of 1823 he assisted in driving a drove of cattle over
the mountains of Philadelphia; and from there he went to Massachusetts,
performing the whole distance on foot. His brother James was
then a practicing physician near Albany, in the State of New York.
Here Frank commenced
the study of medicine, but becoming dissatisfied with that profession he
abandoned it, and in the fall of 1825 returned to Andover. It was
during his stay in the State of New York at this time that, being
without funds and finding no other employment for which money could be
obtained, he labored for a time, with spade and wheelbarrow, upon the
Erie canal, which was then in process of construction. Many years
later, Mr. Seward,
speaking in the United States senate and alluding to this incident,
said, “From whence came the labor that performed that work? I know but
one American citizen who worked with spade and wheelbarrow upon those
works. Doubtless there are many others, but I know but one, and he, I
am glad to say, is a member on this floor,—Mr. Wade,
of Ohio, and one of the most talented members.” His younger brother, Edward,
who has since for many years ably represented the Cuyahoga district in
congress, was at that time a student in the law-office of the Hon.
Elisha Whittlesey,
at Canfield, Ohio.
Frank was
induced to join his brother in that office, and at the end of two years
was admitted to the bar, at Jefferson, Ashtabula County, Ohio. Here he
commenced the practice of his profession, and soon acquired the
reputation of an acute special pleader and a successful advocate. Joshua
R. Giddings was
then a leading lawyer, having the largest practice of any attorney in
the county. In 1831, Mr. Wade entered
into partnership with that gentleman, and they continued together in a
large and successful practice in Ashtabula and the adjoining counties
until 1838, when Mr.
Giddings was
elected to congress. In the fall of 1835, Mr. Wade was
elected prosecuting attorney for the county of Ashtabula. This was his
first public position, and from that time forward his talents, fidelity,
and energy assured him the confidence of the public.
In the fall of the year 1837 the Whig convention nominated him, and
he was elected a member of the Ohio State senate. This nomination was
made in his absence and without his knowledge or desire. Up to this
time the subject of southern slavery, as an element of political and
party contention, had scarcely been agitated. Legislation both State
and national had all favored the institution, and there existed in Ohio
a miserable set of black laws which was the product of the prevailing
sentiment of the country. But at the same time the better feelings of
human nature could not be wholly suppressed. There were some in the
south who saw and felt the injustice of the institution and favored
emancipation; and arrangements had been made by which a settlement of
blacks was formed at a place called Red Oak, on the free side of the
Ohio river, where those who desired could bring their slaves and
emancipate them. This settlement created a feeling of jealousy on both
sides of the line. The conservative spirits of the north feared they
might be overrun by the blacks, and the slave-holders were alarmed by
any movement which had a tendency to weaken or relax the rigor of the
slave system or to ameliorate the condition of the slaves. Fugitives
from slavery were frequently
escaping across the line, and were either harbored in Ohio, or were
aided in their flight to Canada. Thus it happened that, not content
with the state of things then existing, in 1838 the legislature of
Kentucky sent two commissioners, Messrs. Morehead and Price,—the
one a Whig and the other a Democrat,—to persuade the legislature of Ohio
to pass still more rigorous and effective laws for the return of
fugitive slaves. This measure was proposed in the Ohio senate, and Mr. Wade and
only four others arrayed themselves in opposition to its passage. These
five senators, of course, could do nothing but obstruct and delay the
passage of the measure. But this was so boldly and adroitly done that
the commissioners sought an interview with Mr. Wade,
in hopes to mitigate his opposition to their scheme.
That meeting was amusing and characteristic. They came with an
injured and deprecating air, as though appealing to the better feelings
of his nature. They told him of the patriarchal character of the
institution, and how slaves were treated by their masters as their own
children, and showed the cruelty of sundering such ties of tenderness,
and consequently the necessity of more stringent laws to prevent the
evil. Mr. Wade did
not see the character of the institution in that light, and in response
to Mr. Morehead,
the Whig commissioner, he said, “ You want us to pass a law to prevent
your children from running away. In other words, you want to make us
all negro-catchers. Gentlemen, do you engage in this business of
negro-catching, yourselves? I see you do not. If I were master in
Ohio, and found you in this negro-hunting business, I would put you in
irons.” Price,
the Democratic commissioner, cried out, “By heavens! Morehead,
he has got us; it is certainly not the most honorable business.” So
ended the memorable interview. The resistance to the passage of the
bill was protracted two days and one entire night, and a part of
another. The following extract from a speech made by Mr. Wade on
that occasion may be interesting to those who remember the excitement
that followed upon the passage of those fugitive slave laws:
“ Though I stand here at two o’clock at night, and after a
protracted session since yesterday at nine o’clock in the morning, and
though I speak to ears that are deaf and to hearts impervious to a sense
of right and justice and liberty, still I will be heard; and although,
from the timid and servile policy that has been manifested by the
majority on this floor, I have no hope of arresting the progress of this
measure, which shall ere long stamp its supporters with deeper infamy
and degradation than did the famous ‘alien and sedition laws.’ The
champions of this measure, like the heroes of old, before taking up the
gauntlet in its defense, have thought proper to preface their remarks
with a history of their own birth, habits, and education; and, as I
suspected, it appears that they were themselves born or descended from
parents who were born in the murky atmosphere of slavery. Were I to
follow their example and speak of so unimportant a subject as myself, I
would say that I was born in a land where the accursed system of slavery
was unknown; where the councils of the State were swayed by the great
principles of equality; where right and justice were deemed the greatest
expediency. My infancy was rocked in the cradle of universal liberty,
and my parents were of the Revolution. The earliest lesson I was taught
was to respect the rights of others and to defend my own; to resist
oppression to the death neither do nor suffer wrong; to do unto others
as I would they should do unto me; and, though my venerated instructors
have long since passed away, the Godlike principles they taught can
never die; and when they shall cease to influence my conduct, may my
right hand forget its cunning and my tongue cleave to the roof of my
mouth!”
The five senators made a gallant but ineffectual resistance. The
measure was carried, and slavery triumphed for the time. But the event
stamped Mr. Wade as
a man of mark, and one of the most fearless and formidable opponents of
the slave-power. It brought him into immediate and signal notice, and
men came to him from the Red Oak settlement bearing a petition,
numerously signed, for a charter establishing an academy to educate the
freedmen at that place. On the presentation of the petition a storm
broke forth. “Do you know that these are niggers?” And resolutions
were offered to expel him from the senate, so violent were the feelings
against him for presenting a petition signed by colored men. But while
a member of the senate of Ohio he performed noble work in other
respects. He was a member of the judiciary committee, and exerted a
controlling influence in abolishing imprisonment for debt in Ohio, and
also for the passage of a law exempting certain property from execution.
The legislature was then beset by applications for aid to various
public and private enterprises to promote internal improvements in the
State, which resulted in what were afterwards known as the “Plunder
laws." These he opposed, and thereby incurred violent opposition from
members of his own party. In the fall of 1839 he was renominated by the
Whig party in the district, in their regular convention. There was a
Whig majority in the district of four thousand, but so strung was the
pro-slavery feeling in the district, and especially in his own county of
Ashtabula, that he was beaten, and a Democrat elected in his place. But
during the ensuing two years there was a marvelous change wrought in the
feelings of the people. During the presidential canvass of 1840 he was
prominent in the advocacy of General Harrison for
President, and his voice was heard from almost every platform in
northern Ohio; and when the Whig district convention met in 1841 he was
again nominated as a candidate for the Ohio senate by acclamation. The
subject of slavery had been discussed, the views of Mr. Wade had
become popular in the district, and his election was then triumphant.
In the winter of 1841 and 1842 he resigned the office, but was again
elected in the fall of 1842. And during his service in the senate he
had the satisfaction of seeing the Kentucky black laws erased from the
statute-book of the State. He then declined further service, and
devoted himself to the practice of his profession.
In the spring of 1837 he entered into partnership in the practice
of law with Rufus
P. Ranney,
who had previously been a student in his office. The business of that
firm was very large, requiring their attendance upon all the courts in
several counties in the northeast corner of the State. This partnership
continued until Mr. Wade was
elected to a judicial position.
In 1841 he was married to Miss Caroline Rosekrans,
of Middletown, in the State of Connecticut. By her he has two sons,
both of whom performed service for the country in the war of the
Rebellion. James
F., the
oldest son, still remains in the cavalry service, where he now holds the
commission of major, and has had several brevets for meritorious
services.
In February, 1847, Mr. Wade was
elected by the legislature of the State presiding judge of the third
judicial circuit, embracing the counties of Ashtabula, Trumbull,
Mahoning, Portage, and Summit. He entered immediately upon the duties
of the office, which he continued to hold until March, 1851, when he was
elected to the senate of the United States. The circuit was large, and
the dockets of the several courts were very much encumbered with
business when he went upon the bench, but his high legal attainments and
application to business enabled him to dispatch the business of the
courts with great facility, and he soon became as popular on the bench
as he had previously been at the bar. The intelligence of his election
to the United States senate was brought to him in the court-room, while
presiding in court at Akron, in Summit county. The papers in the
northeastern portion of the State had urged his election to that
position but still the news of his election came to him wholly
unexpected, and like every other official position which he had held it
was unsolicited on his part. He did not feel at liberty or disposed to
decline the high honor, and assumed its duties and responsibilities, and
continued to hold the position for eighteen years, during the most
interesting period of the history of the country.
He entered the senate just after the notable compromise measures of
1851. The terrible storm in which those measures had been adopted had
been allayed, but not spent. The compact imposed eternal silence upon
the north on the subject of slavery in the councils of the nation. It
also laid upon the north the ungracious burden of returning fugitive
slaves.
Parties were preparing for the presidential contest. The Whigs had
become demoralized by the death of President Taylor,
and the trouble and perplexity arising from the administration of President Fillmore.
Both of the great national parties gave in their adhesion to the
measures of the compromise, and adopted the same plank of eternal
silence on the subject of slavery. But there was no silence!
The first day that Mr. Wade took
his seat in the American senate, Mr. Foote,
of Mississippi, introduced a series of resolutions to confirm what had
already been done by congress on the subject of slavery, and upon these
resolutions frequent speeches were made during that session. The
canvass of 1852 resulted in the election of Franklin Pierce to
the presidency, and with him a Democratic congress.
Mr. Douglas,
chairman of the committee on Territories, reported in favor of the
organization of Kansas and Nebraska, leaving the report silent on the
subject of slavery. Upon this a fiery debate sprung up; speeches were
made by southern men of the most inflammable character, claiming that
the old Missouri Compromise of 1821 should be abrogated. The report was
recommitted and amended, containing the proposed abrogation of that old
national treaty.
After the nomination of General Taylor for
the presidency in 1848, a large majority of the Whig party on the
Western Reserve revolted and refused to vote for the nominee for the
reason that he was a slave-holder, and uniting with the Democrats who
were disaffected with the nomination of General Cass by
their party, under the name of Free Democrats, supported Martin Van Buren for
the presidency. Van Buren,
when in the presidential chair, had shown himself most subservient to
the slave power. Mr. Wade had
confidence in General Taylor for
uprightness, and believed he could be relied upon for integrity and
impartiality, and he therefore zealously supported the slave-holder in
preference to the northern man with southern principles, although he was
thereby placed in a minority among his own friends and associates. The
death of General Taylor elevated Mr. Fillmore to
the presidency. Mr. Wade,
though sadly disappointed in the course pursued by President Fillmore,
still adhered to the Whig party.
He agreed with that party upon the subject of a protective tariff,
river and harbor improvements, and other kindred measures, and many of
the southern Whigs had proposed to hold generous and moderate sentiments
on the subject of slavery, and he hoped that the old Whig party might be
instrumental in bringing back the government to the purposes of its
founders. He therefore, in 1852, supported the nomination of General Scott,
and vigorously urged his election before the people. In March, 1854,
during the agitation of the proposed repeal of the Missouri Compromise,
he made a speech in the senate clearly defining his opposition to the
measure, and fully demonstrating that the repeal of that act would be
fraught with more evil to the country and more danger to its peace than
had ever occurred to disturb the harmony of the different sections. He
learned from the discussions upon the question that it was to be carried
by a combination of the southern Whigs and those who, for the occasion,
assumed the name of “National Democrats.” At this union for such a
purpose his heart sickened, and he gave utterance to his feelings in a
speech delivered in the senate on the night of the final passage of the
measure. The New York Tribune of that date appropriately called it the
“ new declaration of independence.” In the course of that speech he
severed his connection with the Whig party, and bade farewell to his
former Whig friends of the south. A short extract from that speech may
not be inappropriate. He said, “Mr. President, I do not intend to
debate this subject. The humiliation of the north is complete and
overwhelming. No southern enemy of the north can wish her deeper
degradation. God knows, I feel it keenly enough, and I do not wish to
prolong the melancholy spectacle. I have all my life belonged to the
great national Whig party, and never yet have I failed, with all the
ability I possessed, to support its regular nominations, come from what
portion of the Union they might; and much oftener has it been my lot to
battle for a southern than for a northern nominee for the presidency,
and when such candidate was assailed by those who were jealous of
slave-holders, and our people did not like to yield the government to
such hands, how often have I encountered the violent prejudices with no
little hazard to myself. How triumphantly would I appeal on such
occasions to southern honor, to the magnanimity of soul which I believed
actuated southern gentlemen. Alas! If God will pardon me for what I
have done, I will promise to sin no more in that direction. We
certainly cannot have any further connection with Whigs of the south.
They have rendered such connection impossible. An impassable gulf
separates us. The southern wing of the old Whig party have joined their
fortunes with what is called the ‘National Democracy,’ and I wish you
joy in your new connection. Tomorrow, I believe, there is to be an
eclipse of the sun, and I think it is meet and proper that the sun in
the heavens and the glory of this republic should go into obscurity and
darkness together. Let the bill then pass; it is a proper occasion for
so dark and damning a deed.” No words could do justice to the feelings
of the man, or the occasion which called them forth. From that time he
knew no Whig party. He joined in the organization of the Republican
party, and devoted himself earnestly to the advocacy and support of the
principles and measures of that party in congress and before the people
from Maine to the Mississippi.
In congress the issue was now clearly defined. The south declared
the institution of slavery to be holy, and insisted that it should be
extended and made coextensive with the bounds of the republic; while the
north declared the institution to be inhuman and a relic of barbarism,
and insisted that it should be limited to the territory it then
occupied. A southern senator had declared that he would call the roll
of his slaves at the foot of Bunker Hill monument, and that threat had
met with defiance from northern men.
The repeal of the Missouri Compromise was the torch that lighted
the pile. It raised the tempest that culminated in the Rebellion.
There were but few men from the north in the senate who had the courage
to speak out boldly on that question, but Mr. Wade was
conspicuous among that number. Events followed of a startling
character. The old land-mark of peace was obliterated. Then came
the border ruffians, asking for the admission of Kansas as a slave
State. Douglas, Broderick,
and a few other Democrats became alarmed, and a sense of common danger
drove them to take counsel with some of the most extreme radicals. Of
all men in the senate, Mr. Wade was
most feared, trusted, and respected by his political opponents. He was
a plain, blunt man, like Marc Antony,
and spoke right on. He had none of the graces of oratory; what he said
was clear, simple, and direct. In a single sentence he would sometimes
annihilate an opponent. An instance of this occurred in the debate on
the Kansas-Nebraska question, when Mr. Badger,
of North Carolina, appealed to the senate in a sentimental way. “What!”
said he, “will you not allow me to take my old mammy with me to Kansas;
she on whose breast my infancy was cradled; who watched over my
childhood and takes pride in my manhood?” “Yes,” said Mr. Wade,
“we will permit you to take your old mammy to Kansas, but we will
prohibit you, by law, from selling her after you get her there.” Mr. Badger was
extinguished. That argument admitted of no reply. Badger was
afterwards heard to say that Wade was
the only man he could never get even with. In the same debate, a New
Hampshire senator was making a speech subservient to the ideas of
southern gentlemen. Mr. Wade was
listening attentively to him, when he suddenly turned and said he would
like to put a question to the senator from Ohio. “Would he recognize
his obligations and perform his duty in executing the fugitive slave
law?” Mr. Wade rose,
and, in language more emphatic than reverent or parliamentary,
responded, “No, sir; I’d see ’em damned first.” And he immediately
returned the question, but before the New Hampshire senator had
completed his argumentative reply, Mr. Wade turned
to the Kentucky senators and put the same question to them. The
response came quickly, “No, sir; there is no occasion for it so long as
we have men like the honorable senator from New Hampshire to do it for
us.” Nothing could have been more humiliating to the New Hampshire
senator.
During those years the greatest excitement prevailed in congress,
as well as the country, and scenes of violence were rife on every hand.
The code of honor was prevalent at the south, while at the north it was
condemned by public sentiment. The result was that the conduct of many
southern men became overbearing and insolent. Challenges could be given
with impunity, as it was known that no challenge could be accepted by a
northern man without incurring social and political ostracism among his
own people. At this time a few men in congress, among whom were Wade, Chandler, Broderick, Douglas,
and Cameron,
of the senate, and Burlingame, Potter,
and others of the house, agreed that they would submit to no further
insolence, and that they would accept the first challenge given by any
southern member of congress. That if assailed in words they would
resent the insult in words, and if challenged they would fight. In the
session of 1856, Mr. Sumner spoke
in the senate on the “ barbarism of slavery.” The next day he was
stricken down in the senate chamber by Preston
S. Brooks,
of South Carolina. Senator Toombs,
of Georgia, declared that he witnessed the assault, and declared his
approbation of the deed. He said, “It was nothing more than the senator
from Massachusetts richly deserved; he had played the part of a dog, and
he merited the treatment of a dog.” Mr. Wade,
in response to Toombs,
said, “Those are the sentiments of a coward and an assassin.” A duel
was expected as the result, and Mr. Wade made
his arrangements accordingly. Colonel James
Watson Webb,
who before that time had some experience in dueling, volunteered to act
on his behalf. Inquiries were made whether a challenge would be
accepted; but no challenge came, and on the morning of the fourth day Toombs approached Wade cheerfully,
and said, “What is the use of a man’s making a damned fool of himself
?” “There isn't much,” replied Wade,
“but some men can’t help it.” So ended the expected duel, to the
chagrin of many of the southern members.
Some little time afterwards there was renewed excitement in the
chamber. The Democrats were resorting to all manner of dilatory
movements, when Senator
Toombs arose
and launched out into a most violent denunciation of the north and
northern men, and especially northern members of congress. He was just
in the height of his declamation, when Mr. Wade arose,
and demanded to know if he was included in the invective? Mr. Toombs was
suddenly brought to his senses, and replied, “No; he excepted the
senator from Ohio,” and then went off into a glowing panegyric of Mr. Wade.
Another instance of Mr.
Wade’s
vindication of justice, and of his bold and decided character, came out
in a passage which occurred between the Hon. John
M. Clayton and
himself during the existence of the American or Know-Nothing party, the
purposes of which Mr.
Clayton reviewed
in an elaborate speech in the senate. Senator
Wade was
deeply interested in the passage of the “Homestead bill,” and upon this
bill he stood side by side with Senator Dodge,
a Democratic senator from Iowa. He brought all his influence to bear
upon the success of the measure, and had delivered a powerful argument
in favor of the bill, setting forth the advantages to the country, the
pioneer, and the emigrant. Mr. Clayton followed,
commenting upon the speech in a frank but friendly spirit, to which Mr. Wade took
no exceptions. The speeches were supposed to be printed in the
Congressional Globe as they had been delivered in the senate. Mr. Wade took
no pains to revise or prepare his speeches for publication, but trusted
that work entirely to the reporter, and had not looked to see that those
speeches were correctly reported. A few days afterwards, Mr. Dodge came
to him and asked him if he had seen Senator Clayton’s
reply to his speech on the Homestead bill, as printed in the Globe,
saying, “You ought to take notice of it, as he has ascribed sentiments
to you which I am sure you never held, and has put language into your
mouth which you never uttered.” On looking into the Globe the
representations were found to be true, and Mr. Wade lost
no time in calling to it the attention of the senate and the public. He
was willing to suppose that the senator from Delaware had, through
mistake or inadvertence, attributed to him opinions and expressions
which would be offensive to his constituents and the country. He had
satisfied himself that the reporter of the senate had faithfully
transcribed his language, and he could not account for the course the
senator from Delaware had pursued. Mr. Clayton interrupted
with the remark, accompanied by a malicious glance, “When the senator
gets through I will give my version of the matter.” Mr. Wade concluded
by saying, “It is therefore a mistake or something worse.” Mr. Clayton followed
in a lofty, justifying strain, in which he bore down severely on Mr. Wade,
and took his seat, leaving the impression on every mind that he had made
no mistake, and that his review of the speech of the senator from Ohio
was exactly right. Then Mr. Wade,
rising to his feet, and with a deliberate manner, and looking Clayton
full in the face, declared, “ You, sir, sneaked into your office and
wrote what you knew to be false.” This was the signal for the
intervention of the presiding officer, and the matter was at once
dropped in the chamber, but of course it was anticipated that Mr. Clayton,
as a southern man, would not let the matter rest. That evening Senator Pratt,
of Maryland, acting as the friend of Mr. Clayton,
called on Mr. Wade at
his lodgings to inquire on behalf of the senator from Delaware if Mr. Wade was
a fighting man,—if he recognized the code? Free from the restraint of
parliamentary rules and the decorum of the senate, Mr. Wade replied,
“Go tell the scoundrel if he is tired of life and wants to know my views
of dueling, he can find out by sending the communication in the usual
form.” Senator Pratt remonstrated
upon the severity of this reply, and tried to have him soften it. “I do
not desire to have you act in the matter,” said Mr. Wade,
“but if you tell him anything you will give him my answer unmodified.”
The following morning they met, and Senator Wade was
first to speak. “Well, senator, what next?” “Nothing, nothing at all,”
said Senator Pratt;
“ he is a damned old coward.” There was no further intercourse between Messrs. Clayton and Wade for
the remainder of the senatorial term. When within a few days of its
close, and Mr. Clayton was
to retire to private life, he one day came to Senator Wade,
his eyes filled with tears, and his voice trembling with emotion, and
said, “Senator, that affair which has so long interrupted our
friendship, has cost me more trouble of mind than almost any other of my
life. I feel that I have done you injustice, and that I ought to
rectify it here in the senate, before I leave it forever. I will do so
in any manner you may suggest.” And the brave heart, so quick to
vindicate wounded honor, melted immediately with kindness. “No,” said
he: “Mr. Clayton,
it would have gratified me in the day of it; but it has long gone by,
the circumstance is forgotten; to revive it now will only open to the
public an old wound which they think nothing of. It will be up-hill
business to do it now. Let it rest in oblivion where we have consigned
it.” They grasped hands. Such was the magnanimity which covered the
fault of a fellow-man.
These qualities of mind and heart made him respected even by his
most violent political opponents in the senate far more than many a
northern doughface, whose subserviency they both employed and despised.
After these occurrences they were really better friends than if he had
truckled to their dictation, or failed to show that he would brook no
insolence and hold no malice. In truth, it became quite customary for
gentlemen from the south to pay him public compliments, and the matter
went so far that one day when Senator Mason had
been saying some very nice things of him, he, with some pleasantry,
repelled the praise, responding to the senator from Virginia, “Sir, if
you do not stop saying these things of me it will ruin me at home.” It
became quite common with some of the southern members of congress to
affect great independence of northern markets and manufactures by
wearing what they called home-made clothing. In this matter Senator Mason,
of Virginia, was quite conspicuous. He appeared one day in the senate
chamber clad from top to toe in a genuine suit of Virginia gray. Wade accosted
him. “Well, senator, you are well dressed to day,” at the same time
closely inspecting his dress. “Yes,” said Mason,
“ I mean to do justice by the south, and by my own State in particular.
We will show that we are not dependent upon the north for a shred of
anything.” Wade,
looking full of mischief, stepped up closer, and, taking hold of a
button on Mason's coat,
said, “Of course you will do that. In what part of the south did you
obtain these buttons?” They were, in fact, made in Connecticut, and Mason's face
fell as he growled out, “Nobody hut a damned Yankee would have found
that out.” Senator Evans,
of South Carolina, a very bigoted and precise man, once came into the
senate chamber, and, taking his seat, lifted up a copy of the
Anti-Slavery Standard, which some one had placed there in his absence,
and then, turning to Mr. Wade,
who was standing by, observed, “Who could have put this vile thing upon
my desk?” “Why,” said Wade,
“it is a most excellent family paper.” “Ugh!” said Evans,
“ I would no sooner touch it than I would touch a toad.” At this Wade laughed
heartily, and left the old gentleman in his tribulation. On another
occasion, at the very close of the session, Mr. Evans was
in trouble about some bill, of no general importance, but in which quite
a number of his constituents were interested. He had been trying all
winter to get it passed; but a few hours of the session remained, and
his anxiety was intensified. It was late at night; Senator Foote,
of Vermont, was nodding in the chair. The senate had been in continuous
session for two days and nights. Probably not a quorum was present or
could have been found. Some were absent, some in the ante-rooms, eating
or sleeping; only a few who could get the floor were attending to
business. In his distress he came across the chamber to Mr. Wade,
on the radical side of the hall, a thing he seldom did, and which was
almost as offensive to him as the innocent paper he had found on his
desk, and said, “Here, sir, I have been all winter trying to get a bill
through in which some five hundred of my old neighbors are interested,
and the time is rapidly passing. What can I do?” “My friend,” said the
senator, “jump right up now, interrupt the proceedings, call up your
bill; now is the very time. I will help you.” Evans went
back to his seat and commenced fumbling about for a copy of his bill,
somewhat dazed at the sudden suggestion of his counselor, when Wade was
on his feet and called out, “Mr. President, the senator from South
Carolina, Mr. Evans,
has a bill of a private nature which has been pending for a long time;
he is anxious it should pass. I move the rules be suspended for that
purpose. It will take but a moment.” No one objected Mr. Evans was
recognized almost before he was aware of it. His bill was passed, much
to his delight. “I declare,” said he, “nobody but a Yankee would have
gone to work in that way.” This was the southern fashion in those days;
they spoke of all northern people as Yankees. Such promptness of action
and readiness in expedients were always characteristic of him, at the
bar as well as in legislative halls.
Captain
M. H. Simonds commanded
a company in Colonel
Ball’s
regiment of cavalry in the Mexican war. He died in the service, leaving
three horses and a full outfit for the campaign. The major of the
regiment, as his duty required, took possession of the property and
converted it to cash. The major also died in the service, never having
accounted for the property, and leaving his estate insolvent. The
mother of Captain Simonds,
who was a widow, applied to the departments at Washington for
compensation, but the claim was rejected on the ground that the loss
arose from the failure of the major to discharge his duty in accounting
for the property, and the government does not hold itself responsible
for the failure of its agents. The equity of the case seemed so strong
that she appealed to congress for relief, and the application was placed
in the hands of Senator Wade.
The bill passed the senate promptly, but the committee on pensions, to
which the bill was referred in the house of representatives, rejected
the claim for the same reason urged against it by the departments. At
the next session of congress the bill was again passed through the
senate, went to the house, and was again referred to the committee on
pensions, and the committee reported against the claim as before. Mr. Wade labored
with the chairman of the committee, and urged the equity of the claim,
but he was deaf to all entreaties, and assured Mr. Wade that
he should not permit the bill to pass, under any circumstances, as he
should regard its passage as a dangerous precedent. Some few days
after, Mr. Wade went
into the house of representatives and found the house engaged in passing
private bills, and he observed that the chairman of the committee on
pensions was absent. He went to the seat of Mr. Morgan,
of New York, and told him the nature and merits of the claim and the
difficulties attending its passage. Mr. Morgan expressed
his desire to aid him, but feared that nothing could be done; that it
could not be carried over an adverse report of the committee. “Why,”
said Mr. Wade,
“don’t you see that they are now taking up the reports of committees and
passing the bills without objection ?” “Yes,” said Morgan,
“ but in those cases the reports are all in favor of the claims, and in
this case the report, you see, is against the claim.” “But,” said Wade,
“ you can move to take up the report and put the bill on its passage
without mentioning the fact that the report is adverse.” Morgan consented
to try the experiment. The motion prevailed, and the bill passed
without objection. Thus an equitable claim triumphed over technical
objections.
In September, 1860, Senator Broderick,
of California, fell in a duel. Mr. Wade held
that gentleman in high estimation, and regarded him as one of the most
reliable men in the senate on the subject of northern rights, which were
then imperiled. And the circumstances regarding his death were such
that Mr. Wade regarded
him as a martyr to the cause of freedom. The following expression of
his estimate of the character of Senator Broderick,
as made in the senate, is quoted here because of the striking similarity
of character between the fallen senator, as described by Mr. Wade,
and his distinguished eulogist: “Mr. President, though not of the same
political party, I cannot suffer this occasion to pass without
expressing my deep sense of the noble qualities and manly character of David
C. Broderick.
It was my good fortune to become well acquainted with him soon after he
took his seat in this body. He was unassuming in manner, but frank,
outspoken, and sincere, despising all intrigue and indirection. He was
possessed of an excellent understanding and a fine capacity for
business. His love of justice was remarkable. Having once determined
and settled in his own mind what was right, he was as immovable as the
hills. Neither the threats or blandishments of power nor personal peril
could move him from his purpose. Being of the people, their rights,
interests, and their advancement was the polar star of his action. For
these he was at all times ready to labor, and, if need be, to die. In
short, he was the very soul of honor, without fear and without
reproach. The loss of such a man, Mr. President,
is indeed a public calamity.”
Buchanan’s
administration had been as weak and imbecile as it was possible to be,
and events were culminating rapidly. The Republican party had been
forced into existence by the very necessity of the time. The
presidential canvass of 1860 had resulted in the election of Mr. Lincoln,
and the time intervening between November and the ensuing March, when he
was to be inaugurated, was used by southern members of congress to
promote the project of secession, and to plunge the country into civil
war. It was a period of the utmost uncertainty and anxiety, when men’s
hearts failed them for fear, and when many who had been resolute on the
slavery question were trembling, vacillating, and ready to give
everything to the demands of the south. Mr. Wade was
one of the few men who never flinched. He looked the question squarely
in the face, and acted in that great emergency with a coolness and
deliberation which now seem surprising. He was one of the famous joint
committee of thirteen to take into consideration the last peace
resolutions ever offered in congress for the conciliation of the two
sections,—the resolutions presented by Mr. Crittenden,
of Kentucky. His associates on that committee from the senate were Messrs. Davis, Mason, Toombs,
and Benjamin.
In the consultations of this committee every inducement brought to bear
on Mr. Wade to
make him swerve one hair's breadth from the line of his convictions
proved utterly futile. He told Mr. Davis,
who was the acknowledged leader of the southern men in congress, that he
was convinced that while the south professed to desire peace, that she
meant war; that the resolutions, however well designed by their author,
were only a delusion and a snare; that the north would not accept them,
and even if she did, it would not satisfy the augmenting demands of the
south. “Well,” said Jefferson Davis,
“if war comes it will not be on our section on which it will spend its
force.” He had good reason for saying this, for the opposition journals
of the north were teeming with declarations that if the black
Republicans adopted any measures of coercion to prevent secession they
would first have to encounter opposition at home, and to walk over the
dead bodies of countless Democrats, who would not, in such a crisis,
abandon the cause of their southern brethren. But the reply of Mr. Wade showed
how well he understood the situation, how clearly he saw the real heart
of his countrymen through the mist and darkness of that perilous hour.
“I know," said he, “ what the city of New York has done; I know the
resolutions which have just been passed by two hundred thousand
Democrats in Ohio, and I know what has been done in Indiana; and let
them carry out the doctrine and purpose of their resolutions who can.
But the first gun that is fired will secure emancipation, and the
Democrats will desert you. They are now leading you into a trap, and,
like the devil, they will leave you there to get out the best way you
can.” The consultations of the committee failed; the counsels of the
great peace convention, held at Washington about the same time, failed.
Everything failed which even looked towards peace. The tide of
alienation was sweeping all before it. The Republican members of
congress, giving themselves up to the drifting current of events, sat
silent while the torrent of speech-making was flowing from southern
lips. At length Mr. Wade got
the floor for the ensuing Monday; meantime Mr. Douglas came
to him and said, “I want to make a speech. It shall be strong
anti-slavery. There is no use talking longer for peace. I will make
the speech on Monday if you will yield me the floor.” To this Mr. Wade assented,
and Douglas kept
his mind until Sunday night, and then gave up his purpose. It was just
as well. Mr. Wade occupied
the floor on that signal Monday. He did not speak very long, but long
enough to exhibit the real situation. His words were blunt and plain.
He closed by saying, “You have made yourselves believe that you can whip
the north. If, however, you should make a little mistake here, you will
be in hell!” He afterwards remarked that Stephens,
of Georgia, had told them the same thing. That speech had a vast
influence. From that time forward there was little talk of peace. The
southern States, led on by South Carolina, began to take measures and
pass ordinances of secession. The southern members of congress began to
make farewell speeches, and to vacate their seats in the capitol.
The 4th of March arrived. Mr. Lincoln was
inaugurated in a scene of the greatest excitement and apprehension; and
old President Buchanan was
relieved, at once and forever, of the burden of a position where he had
been sitting for the last three months of his term crying and wringing
his hands and sobbing out his broken and incoherent and despairing
conversations with his visitors, “I have been the last President of the
United States.” Fort Sumter was attacked on the 12th of April, 1861.
Congress had done its work and gone. The new congress was summoned to
meet on the 4th of July of the same year. Senator Wade was
early recognized as one of the few spirits who had the nerve to meet the
great emergency. He was the chairman of the joint committee on the
conduct of the war, and held this position during the whole of that
bloody struggle which followed. He was up early and late; he did an
immense amount of business, visiting the different sections of the
country and the armies in the field, and making reports, from time to
time, on the progress of the strife, the subjects of which now fill
eight large volumes, containing some of the most thrilling passages in
the history of the war. It was towards the close of Mr. Lincoln’s
first term that the brilliant success in the southwest, which re-opened
Louisiana to the Federal jurisdiction, induced him to propose a line of
policy for the restoration of the recusant States that would have left
the whole subject of emancipation in a very precarious condition. Senator Wade,
who was then chairman of the committee on Territories in the senate,
and Henry Winter Davis,
who was chairman of the committee on Territories in the house of
representatives, were the only men who stood up openly opposed to this
policy. The subject came up just at the close of the session, which
gave them no opportunity to present the question fairly before
congress. They therefore prepared a powerful manifesto against the
proposal of the President, signed it, and sent it to the New York
Tribune for publication. Tried and pronounced against slavery, in all
its forms, as were the conductors of that paper, they refused to publish
the document; but it was issued in the form of a circular, and
effectually did the work; the scheme was abandoned. This was done, not
out of opposition to Mr. Lincoln,
but because they saw more clearly than he seemed to see, the pernicious
tendency of his policy; they stood by him notwithstanding. He was
chosen for a second term, and at last the fearful struggle was ended.
In his rejoicing over the result, Mr. Lincoln was
about again to yield to the weakness of excessive kindness. He actually
went down to Richmond, after its occupation by our troops, and gave a
private order to General Heintzleman,
then in command in that city, to convene the old Confederate Virginia
State legislature, and to clothe them with all the authority they
possessed as a legislative body before the act of secession. Then it
was that Senator Wade again
remonstrated and brought down upon himself much ignorant and ill-timed
censure of the press. But the result showed him to be right in this, as
he was in his joint action with Mr. Davis before.
A commission of military men was formed to examine the action of the
officer in charge at Richmond. When asked upon what authority he had
convoked the rebel legislature, he quietly drew forth an order in the
handwriting of Abraham Lincoln,
bearing a foot-note which read, “Show this to no one but Judge
John A. Campbell,”
who was still in Richmond, having been a member of the rebel cabinet.
But in the midst of these rapid and marvelous events President Lincoln was
shot down. The nation and the world were shocked by the murderous
deed. The whole order of things was changed by the elevation of Andrew Johnson to
the presidential chair. Johnson proved
false to the Republican party and to the interests of the nation. Mr. Wade was
now regarded as the head of the Republican party in the senate. He was
made president pro tem, of the senate, and became vice-president in
fact. The impeachment trial of Johnson followed,
and he was acquitted by one vote. Had that trial resulted differently, Mr. Wade would
have succeeded Johnson in
the presidential chair. In 1869, Mr. Wade retired
from the senate, and up to the time of his death remained much in
private life, occasionally, however, engaged in professional affairs,
which required his attendance at Washington during most of the sessions
of congress. When, however, the excitement arose on the Saint Domingo
question, President Grant appointed
him chairman of the commission to visit Saint Domingo. The expedition
was successfully accomplished, and a report was made which sustained the
views of the President and his action in relation thereto.
In 1875, Mr. Wade participated
in the State canvass, and several public speeches were made by him in
behalf of the Republican party and General Hayes,
its candidate for governor. He was a delegate from the Seventeenth
congressional district of Ohio in the Republican convention in 1876, and
was very influential in procuring the nomination of General Hayes as
the candidate for the presidency. He was also one of the presidential
electors for the State at large, that cast the vote of Ohio for General Hayes for
President, and was selected to convey the electoral votes to Washington.
He took a deep interest in the affairs of the nation, and was
prompt in expressing his disapprobation of the policy adopted by President Hayes,
regarding his course as unjust to the Republicans of the south and as
endangering the perpetuity of the Republican party, which Mr. Wade regarded
as essential to good government and the protection of the rights of the
citizens.
In the summer of 1861, when the call of the President was issued
for seventy-five thousand men, in pursuance of a proclamation by the
governor of Ohio the citizens of Jefferson came together and were
addressed by Mr. Wade.
A call was made for volunteers, and Mr. Wade’s
name appeared first upon the roll. The requisite number for a company
was immediately obtained, and the company was organized and their
services tendered to the governor. But the result showed that seven
companies in Ashtabula County had organized at the same time, and the
governor could receive only two of that number. The Jefferson company
was not one of those selected.
Through life Mr. Wade was
abstemious in his habits, alike in eating and drinking, and he possessed
a strong and vigorous constitution, which rendered him capable of great
endurance, and this, with his indomitable perseverance and untiring
industry, always enabled him to discharge with promptness whatever
duties devolved upon him. Hence he never seemed to be pressed with
business, but possessed much of apparent leisure.
He was plain and unassuming in manners, whatever position he held,
whether at the bar, on the bench, or presiding over the senate of the
nation. He was zealous and earnest in the advocacy of measures, and
sometimes sarcastic in language, but he impressed all who heard him with
his sincerity, and he rarely created an enemy. He was prudent and
economical in his personal expenses, but liberal in his charities, and
the sufferer never went empty-handed from his door when he had the power
to relieve. Integrity of purpose and a keen sense of honor were
conspicuous traits in his character. The writer of this sketch on one
occasion went into his law-office and found him alone and apparently
moody and in ill temper; at length he broke out: “I never have felt so
humiliated in my life as by an incident that has just occurred. I
cannot restrain myself from speaking of it, and still I should feel
disgraced in the opinion of all honest men were it made public.” He
referred to a citizen of intelligence and good standing in the
community, saying, “That man has just left my office, and while here he
referred to a suit which I am prosecuting against him, indirectly
offering me a consideration if I would not press the suit against him.
My first impression, ’ said Wade,
“was to kick him out of the office; but on reflection, on second
thought, I was so humiliated by the proposition that it seemed to me
that I had been guilty of some wrong myself. I asked him what I had
ever done, or what he had ever seen or heard of me that led him to
suppose it was safe to offer me a bribe to induce treachery to my
client.” Mr. Wade said
it was the first time he had ever been approached by any man with such
an intimation, and he hoped his character for integrity stood high
enough so that it might never be repeated. It probably never occurred
again. And his friends have the satisfaction of knowing that through
his long career of public and private duties no man ever impeached his
integrity or made a charge of pecuniary wrong against him.
Since the foregoing sketch was prepared for publication Mr. Wade has
passed away. The following announcement of his death in the Cleveland
Herald, of Mar. 4, 1878, we append, as a just tribute to his memory.
OBITUARY.
EX-SENATOR BENJAMIN F. WADE
The Hon. Benjamin Franklin Wade,
formerly United States senator from Ohio, died at his home in Jefferson,
Ashtabula County, Mar. 2, after an illness of more than four weeks,
which he bore with characteristic fortitude. The news of the death of Mr. Wade,
at the ripe age of seventy-eight years, has long been anticipated by the
public. His vigorous constitution gave way slowly to disease, and death
came only after a long and painful struggle. Mr. Wade has
for a quarter of a century been a prominent figure in the politics of
Ohio, and is among the last of the anti-6lavery pioneers. Elected to
the senate by the Whig party in Ohio, in 1851 after serving two terms in
the senate of this State, and as judge of his district, he was twice
re-elected, and for eighteen years held a conspicuous position in the
councils of the nation. His fame as a statesman will rest upon his
long, earnest, and devoted adherence to the principles of the
anti-slavery party in America. It was during his term of service in the
senate that the slavery excitement culminated in civil war, and the
north and south met in bloody conflict to decide the issue by an appeal
to arms. From his entrance into the senate he was known as an
Abolitionist, and one year after taking his seat voted in favor of the
repeal of the fugitive slave law. On all questions calculated to extend
or benefit slavery he was always found bravely and fearlessly in the
opposition, and his speeches against the repeal of the Missouri
Compromise, the Lecompton constitution for Kansas, the purchasing of
Cuba, are all fresh in the memory of our people. A genuine friend of
the laboring man, he advocated for years the passage of the Homestead
bill, and had charge of the measure when it passed the senate. As
chairman of the joint committee on the conduct of the war, he urged the
most vigorous action on the part of our armies, favored confiscation of
the property of leading rebels, and the emancipation of their slaves.
He was prominent in compelling the abolition of slavery in the District
of Columbia, and in 1862 reported a bill abolishing slavery in all the
Territories of the Union or in any that might be acquired. His
connection with the impeachment of President Johnson is
well known, and his narrow escape from becoming President familiar to
all our readers.
When Mr. Wade entered the senate he was unknown to nearly
all its members. Plain in person and speech, with homespun manners and
provincial dress, holding principles abhorrent to nearly all his
colleagues, he met with a cold reception, and for a time was almost
personally ignored. He was placed on no committee, and the majority of
the senate took small pains to L__gu__ how little sympathy they felt for
him or his principles. But Mr. Wade was naturally a bold,
fearless, courageous man, and the efforts to silence his voice and
discourage his speech were early met by him with open defiance, and
senators soon found he not only was determined to be heard, but had the
will and the pluck to assert his rights fearlessly and with manly
vigor. He sought no personal quarrel, nor avoided one by any sacrifice
of principle. It was soon discovered that the plain, unassuming man
form Ohio was equal to any emergency, and would prove an ugly customer
if forced into a merely personal conflict. Hence he gained the genuine
respect of his opponents, and finally their warm friendship and regard.
Mr. Wade during the years of his public life, was eminently
trusted and beloved by the people. They liked his rugged manner, plain,
straightforward, homely speech. They knew he was earnest, honest,
sincere. His fearless utterances upon the question of human liberty
found a ready response in their hearts, and his stirring eloquence upon
the stump aroused their enthusiasm and stimulated their real. Few men
could portray the evils of slavery with more effective skill, and his
denunciation of the "hellish traffic" in human beings found ready
response in the heart of his bearers.
The life of Mr. Wade had been one eminently useful to his
country. From the humblest position, with scanty education, and from
the home of poverty, relying upon his own common sense, shrewdness, and
practical nature, he rose steadily in the affection and confidence of
the people until he became the acting vice-president of the United
States. Mr. Wade was the most earnest and sincere of men in his
convictions, and even under the influence of strong emotion had full
command of suitable and expressive words, and the power to move his
bearers in strains of true and genuine eloquence. His manners were open
and frank, his speech at all times free and unreserved, and the absolute
sincerity of the man was stamped in every line of his countenance.
---------------
* By C. S. Simonds.
Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 17 |
Edward Wade |
EDWARD WADE.*
The Wades were
a tough, hardy, brave, intellectual, strong-fibred folk. One would like
to know something of the genesis of the family and the course of their
history. A family of nine by the same parents, of which “Frank”
(B.
F.)
and “Ned”
were the youngest, must have been remarkable. The four elder died
between ages of seventy-eight and eighty. The two survivors are eighty
and seventy-eight. Of the others, one died at fifty-three, one at
sixty-three, and one at sixty-nine.* Thoroughly English in breed, of
the average rank, impregnate with the honesty, wholesome virtues,
wisdoms, and experiences of the common toiling life, full of vigor and
vitality, with a sense of the ludicrous, a germ of grim humor, and a
touch of the heroic, combative and tender. The father, James,
was some time a shoemaker, a stout soldier, a daring privateer, and
fought as often and as bravely as the eight years War of the Revolution
permitted. The mother, Mary Upham,
was the daughter of a Baptist clergyman, Edward
Upham,
inbred with the religious elements of the denomination, intensified by
its persecutions in Massachusetts in colonial times. Edward,
the youngest, was born at Feeding Hills, West Springfield,
Massachusetts, Nov. 22, 1802. He received his grandfather’s name and
religious nature. The family removed to Andover, Ashtabula County,
Ohio, in 1821. He early manifested an ingenious mind, with a tendency
for mathematics; and when about twenty-one composed and wrote a new
arithmetic, which was burned with a brother-in-law’s house, where it was
deposited. He studied law with Elisha Whittlesey,
and after a three years’ thorough course was admitted at Jefferson in
1827; was elected justice of the peace in 1831; married the first time
in 1832; elected prosecuting attorney in 1833. He resided a few years
at Unionville; removed to Toledo engaged in speculation; went up in the
explosion of 1837, though he afterwards paid every dollar. After the
failure he removed to Cleveland, formed a partnership with Woolsey Wells,
and later with H.
A. Hurlbut.
Subsequently he was a member of the firms of Payne, Wilson & Wade, Hitchcock, Wilson & Wade,
and Wilson & Wade.
He was four times elected to congress from the Cleveland district,
serving from 1853 to 1861. He died at East Cleveland, Ohio, 1866. Edward Wade had
but the scanty opportunity for education found by a boy of the people of
his time. An eager thirst for knowledge, indomitable pluck, a strong,
quick intellect, and hopeful spirit enabled him to outstrip the average
boys of his neighborhood. More sanguine than his brother Frank,
he induced him to enter upon the law. Few men ever more thoroughly
mastered the common law. He was the best special pleader of his day.
His success was slow,—might have discouraged a less determined spirit.
His ventures in speculation were a grave hindrance. Dark and saturnine
of face, which to strangers was a little forbidding, to which was added
the austerities of religion, and the odium that attached to the name of
Abolitionist, which he early acquired, an early lack of fluency, with
his often change of residence, conspired to keep him for many years in
the background. Nor was he fortunate in the associates of the two first
firms of which he was a member. Persistent, indomitable, aspiring,—such
a man cannot always be repressed. He laid his foundation deep in
thorough learning, and his time came. He overcame the counties around
Cleveland first. Lawyers who knew him had him employed in difficult
cases, and the other side sometimes found themselves beaten by his
better law, and they could hardly tell why. And the shrewd, hard-headed
New Englanders came to know that behind the repulsive, cast-iron mask of
a face there lay a charm which they saw was potent. He became a leader
in Geauga, Lake, Lorain, and visited other counties on important
retainers, yet he had no place at the Cleveland bar, where he lived.
Finally, Henry
B. Payne,
one of the ablest lawyers of the State, overworked and in failing
health, wanted relief, and Payne & Wilson were
supplemented with Wade,
and the city was astonished by the revelation which the firm made of
him. With the failing health and gradual diminution of the head, the
firm became a legal kangaroo. Upon the retirement of Mr. Payne, Reuben
Hitchcock took
his place, Mr. Wade content
to stand nominally third. No man perhaps ever cared less where his name
stood. Mr. Hitchcock was
then at his best, and second to none as an able and laborious lawyer. Mr. Wilson did
the dignity, suavity, and deportment of the firm. For several years the
house ranked with any in the State. I have stated the thoroughness of Mr. Wade’s
legal training. On his early foundation he carefully built the
ever-growing, ever widening and rising structure, a profound and
accomplished lawyer. Master of the common law, thoroughly versed in
chancery, and at home in the narrow range of the laws of crimes, there
was not at the bar a more versatile man. He was also widely read in
history, biography, and politics; kept up with the progress of the
natural sciences. He excelled as nisi
prius lawyer
in the management and trial of cases before a jury. A master of
pleading, with the rules of evidence at his command, knowing and
sympathizing with the average mind, the habits of life, and mode of
thought of the people of whom he came, he became one of the most
formidable opponents to be met with in northern Ohio, whose bar was in
no way behind that of any section of the State. With practice and
perseverance he became one of the best and most successful advocates of
his region. The defects and hesitancies that marred his utterance
disappeared forever. He had a copious command of language, a flowing
delivery, free, bold action, warmed readily, was intensely earnest,
ingenious, and logical. Nature had given him a fine, strong voice of
great power, with the tone of a trumpet in its higher notes. He was not
without fancy, and an abundant, homely humor. He never overshot the
jury. His illustrations were all drawn from common things,—the kitchen
door-yard and barn-yard,—were always apt, often irresistible. He said a
good many things which were repeated. With his strong, deep, intense
nature, kindled to a height which he often attained, his declamation was
most impressive, sometimes splendid, and justly called eloquent. He had
much of that magnetic power which seizes the blood and sympathy of an
audience, adding effectiveness to an assault which shatters a position
found proof against logic and argument. Combative was he, as lawyers
must be, and a masterpiece of will, which is a great force. Men often
carry cases because they will. Though a man of the quickest and
tenderest feelings, he had no pathos and little imagination. A most
unambitious speaker, he never labored for fine effects. The good things
were struck out by the collision of thought, his fire a natural product,
and his humor unstudied.
Edward Wade was
originally a Whig,—made the canvass of 1840 for Harrison.
The anti-slavery seed had quick, vigorous, and hardy growth in his deep,
rich nature. He became, soon after the canvass, an avowed, unwavering
political Abolitionist. Thought with him became immediate action. He
was at once the leader and the spokesman of the few despised and
persecuted who had the conviction and courage to organize in political
opposition to slavery. At the county-seats where he attended court, at
secluded school-houses, whether the audience was few or many, a master
of the subject, with labored earnestness he planted with unstinting hand
the seed that was so soon to spring up and ripen. He was the Liberty
party candidate for congress, against Mr. Giddings,
as long as Cleveland was in the same district. He canvassed with more
labor and care than after the multitude came to act with him. In 1849,
in the triangular contest between the Whigs, Free-Soilers, and
Democrats, he was a candidate for the Ohio senate, and defeated by a
small plurality. In 1853, in a similar contest, he was elected to
congress against Judge Wilson,
his former partner, and William
Case.
His more famous brother had been four years in the senate when he took
his seat in the house.
Though the odium which attended the name “Abolitionist” had in a
way died out in Mr. Wade’s
district, it had not in Washington, and was remembered against him. The
time was past for partisan warfare. He was one of many, all able and
all older men in the house. He was not favored with any conspicuous
place on any important committees, although he served with great credit
for four congresses, and retained the undiminished love and confidence
of his people to the last. His early unselfish devotion to truth bore
him this endearing fruit. He made several able and telling speeches, but
can hardly be said to have gained the ear of the house. On the
committee of commerce he made a masterly and exhaustive report on the
commerce of the lakes,—the first upon that subject. The results which
it exhibited were a revelation even to men whose lives, labors, and
capital were embarked in it, and gave the author a reputation through
the country which should have secured him a better recognition in the
house. Those were the evil days, the breaking up of old political
organization, and of the government as well. Another, and personally
to Mr. Wade and
his friends a most melancholy factor, is to be taken into the account in
estimating the reason why he never reached the position in the house
which those who knew him best expected. He certainly did not fall below
his brother in ability. He had a wider reading at that time of their
lives, and much more general culture; in manner and address more
polished. He died of a softening of the brain. How early the shadow of
the awfulest of fates, heralding its oncoming, had darkened the high,
pure soul, and weakened the faculties of his strong, clear, practical,
fervid intellect, no mortal knows. From things learned at the capital,
it must have been some years before his retirement from the house. His
career there, compared with the average, was not only most useful but
highly honorable. It saddens me to remember that it fell short of the
promise of his powers and abilities as exhibited at the bar and as a
political speaker. Mr. Wade’s
first wife was Sarah Louise Atkins,
one of the several daughters of Judge
Q. F. Atkins,
of whom it was said that his face, if
set on Mason and Dixon’s line, turned to the south, would of itself
abolish slavery. The daughters were all superior women, and it was
understood that it was the earnest, personal solicitation of the young
lady, preceding marriage, that first effectively called the attention of
her lover to the subject of religion. Mrs. Wade was
quite the equal of any of her sisters, and save that the marriage was
unblessed with offspring, it was one of rare felicity. Gifted and
cultivated, of rich and varied charities, harmonious in life, united in
effort for the various causes of human advancement, especially of the
slave and temperance, their house became the asylum of the flying
fugitive, as their hands were eager to relieve suffering in all forms.
The cause they knew not they searched out. They adopted two children,
offsprings of different parents, a son and daughter, whom they reared
with the utmost care. The son was an early victim of the late war. The
daughter is the accomplished wife of Henry P.
Wade,
son of B.
F. Wade,
a gallant young officer late of the regular army. The first Mrs.
Wade died
in 1852. During the early years of Mr. Wade’s
congressional services he contracted a second marriage with Miss
Mary P. Hall, the
accomplished niece of the late Dr.
J. P. Kirtland,
who survives him. This marriage was also childless. The religious
element in the nature of this well-endowed man was large and constantly
active. The tone of his mind, although he wrote an arithmetic in youth,
had a tendency to the visionary, and for a time he was a believer in the
Second Advent. It was remarked by his opponents, however, that during
this period his cases were prepared with the same care and tried with
the same consummate skill that marked his entire career at the bar. In
person he was compact, well-made, with an erect carriage, and the same
manly and lofty pose of head that characterized his brother Frank.
These men, though the least conscious of mortals, could not help
carrying themselves as full men. In repose Edward was
grave and thoughtful, with an earnest, almost sad outlook from black
eyes, the rather austere, dark face, framed in night-black curly hair,
of silky gloss and fineness, and late in life adorned with a full
whisker, was ever ready to break into smiles, which lit it up with great
winningness. Of frank and pleasing manner, modest and retiring
deportment, no man could be more genial and cordial, no man was ever
better loved by those who came to know him,—a not difficult
acquisition,—and no man had a wider and stronger hold on the popular
heart than he finally won. A more open spirit, a tenderer, braver,
purer soul, never found lodging in the frame of man. A more unselfish,
devoted heart never sent warmth through the human form. A man was he in
every fibre of his person, every instinct of his nature, every impulse
of his heart. Brave and blameless, trusted, loved, deplored, compelled
to linger above the horizon after his night had set in, the mere body
breathing and feeding when the masterful spirit had departed. The
sadness of this fate throws its shadow back over his life, and invests
his memory with a regretful
tenderness.
---------------
*Hon. A. G. Riddle. Written
before the death of B. F.
Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 84 |
|
HON. JONATHAN WARNER,
was born at Chester Parish, in old Saybrook, Connecticut, Dec. 11,
1782. His father, Jonathan,
was a farmer, and also owned some interest in vessels engaged at that
time in the coasting trade. The young man was bred principally upon the
farm, but had acquired some experience as a sailor upon his father’s
vessels, and had at one time made a cruise to the West Indies. In the
fall of 1804, in company with a man named Olmsted, he ventured on an
exploring expedition to the western country. He was provided with a
letter of credit, which spoke of him in high terms of praise.
At Buffalo they procured a boat, and started upon the lake for New
Connecticut, and his nautical experience was of value during a violent
storm, which compelled them to run their boat ashore, where they spent a
night under its shelter. They landed at the mouth of Ashtabula creek,
and made their way to the interior as far as the present village of
Jefferson. Here Mr. Warner selected
lands embracing a part of the present village, while his companion made
his settlement in what is now known as the township of Kingsville. At
that time there was but one resident of the township of Jefferson, a man
by the name of Mapes, who had previously settled upon a part of the same
land, and had built a log house and cleared a few acres. Mr. Warner purchased
his improvements and made provision for a future home, although before
locating permanently he went back to Connecticut. In the spring of 1805
he returned, and fixed his permanent residence in Jefferson.
In 1806 other settlers came into the township. Among them came Edward
Frethy,
with his family, from Washington city. He was the first postmaster, the
first justice of the peace, and the first merchant in Jefferson.
Mr. Warner was
pleased with the wilderness in which he had located, and which he was
making every effort to destroy. As a matter of choice he had settled in
a hermitage far from human habitations, and yet he found it not good to
be alone, and on the 4th day of May, 1807, he was married to Nancy,
a daughter of Edward Frethy.
His residence was three-fourths of a mile distant, and he went for his
bride on horseback. After the ceremony was performed he took her upon
the crupper and carried her to his cabin, near the same spot where she
now resides, at the advanced age of eighty-nine years, and where she
continued the partner of his joys and of his sorrows through his life.
The first selection of land made by Mr. Warner embraced
the land upon which the court-house was afterwards located; but to
accommodate the new village and to secure the county-seat he was induced
to exchange a portion of his selection for lands lying farther west and
adjoining the proposed town.
In the year 1815 he was appointed recorder of deeds for the county,
for the term of seven years. In the year 1825 he was appointed treasurer
of the county. Soon after this time the anti- Masonic excitement
prevailed in politics, and Mr. Warner was
an active leader in the anti-Masonic party. In the fall of 1831 he was
elected a representative to the State legislature, and in the spring of
1839 he was elected by the legislature of the State an associate judge
of the court of common pleas, for the term of seven years, his term
expiring on Apr. 1, 1846. He was always an active partisan in politics,
and always in sympathy with the Democratic party, except during the few
years that the anti-Masonic party had a political existence. He had
eleven children, one of whom died in infancy. Of the ten who reached
maturity,—four sons and six daughters,—all but one are now living, and
all have families of their own, who now hold respectable positions in
society. George,
his second son, was killed by accident, Mar. 25, 1877, in Washington
Territory, where he left a wife and two children. Judge Warner died
at his old residence in Jefferson on the 12th day of April, 1862, in his
eightieth year, respected and honored by all.
He was a vigorous man, possessed of a strong will, a kind heart,
and affectionate disposition. He was a valuable citizen, exact and
trustworthy in all his dealings, as well in public as in private life.
And as one of the pioneers of the county, who has helped to found and
build up its institutions, his life and character are worthy of
commemoration by the present as well as by the future generations of
this county who may follow after him.
Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 115 |
|
CAPTAIN
JOHN B. WATROUS, second
son of John
and Roxanna Watrous,
was born at Saybrook, Connecticut, Jan. 15, 1790. When seventeen years
of age, he made the journey to Ashtabula, Ohio, on horseback, and bought
the farm on which he afterwards resided, now known as “ Maple Grove.”
He returned to Connecticut, and remained there until 1810, when, with
his parents and family, he removed permanently to his wilderness home.
The journey was performed by means of ox-teams, —two yoke of oxen to
each wagon. A log dwelling was soon erected, which quickly became a
centre of graceful hospitalities to a large circle of genial friends. John
B. was
a soldier in the War of 1812, as were also two of his brothers. He was
a prominent member of the Masonic fraternity, one of the first workers
for the establishment of an Episcopal church in Ashtabula, and a
director in the “Warren and Ashtabula Turnpike Company,” then considered
a road of great importance to the country. His tastes were literary,
and to a polished exterior he added the graces of a Christian
character. His was a nature dispensing sunshine wherever he moved.
Married at thirty-three years of age to a beautiful woman much his
junior, he was a tender husband and judicious parent. He died in ripe
old age, Feb. 24, 1869. His wife, Julia Montgomery,
was born in Conneaut, Dec. 14, 1806. She was the youngest daughter of James
Montgomery (who
was the son of Robert
Montgomery),
and was born in Schoharie, New York. Robert Montgomery had emigrated
from the north of Ireland, had been a soldier of the Revolution, and was
a cousin-german of the Robert Montgomery who
fell at Quebec.
James Montgomery had
married Mary Baldwin,
of Catskill, New York. The pair became pioneers of Conneaut, Ashtabula
County, having removed there three years after the first settlement of
Harpersfield. The journey from Buffalo was made in open boats, the
intervening country being but a trackless forest. The parents and their
four children disembarked at night, sleeping on the beach beneath their
sheltering boats. Arrived at Conneaut, a dwelling was hastily
constructed from the barks of trees, until a more substantial one of
logs could be made; and this speedily became “a tavern,” for the
accommodation of people emigrating still farther towards the setting
sun.
The husband followed the business of boating between Conneaut and
Erie, thus supplying the infant colony with provisions and other
necessaries of life. He served for a time in the War of 1812, and later
served for two successive terms in the legislature at Chillicothe, then
the seat of government for the State.
Four more children were born to them in Conneaut, and when Julia was
four years of age the Watrous family,
then on their way to Ashtabula, stayed overnight at this inn, and then
and there began the acquaintance which culminated in the marriage of John
B. Watrous and Julia
Montgomery on
the 23d of June, 1823.
James
Montgomery removed
to Austinburg in 1813, and here soon after was born his son, Colonel
James Montgomery,
of Kansas celebrity,—the famed “ guerrilla chieftain,” the “ fighting
preacher.” Colonel Montgomery also
commanded the Union army in Florida during the “ late unpleasantness.”
He died at Mound City, Kansas, in 1872.
James
Montgomery, Sr.,
died at Ashtabula in 1834, and Mrs.
Julia Montgomery Watrous is
now the sole survivor of her father’s family.
----- Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 144 |
E. M. Webster
Residence of
Dr. E. M. Webster,
Kingsville,
Ashtabula Co., O
|
E. M. WEBSTER, M. D.,
was born in the township where he now resides, on the 21st day of May,
1827. His parents were Hiram
Hall and Corinna L. Webster.
He received an academic education, and, on its completion, read medicine
with his father, and graduated at Hudson medical college, Cleveland,
Ohio, receiving his degree Feb. 22, 1854. Has practiced medicine with
eminent success until this time, except a brief period passed at
Philadelphia, as follows: in 1862 he was mustered into the United States
army as an assistant-surgeon, and assigned to duty as post-surgeon at
that point. His brother, who was with the army, died soon after, when
the doctor resigned his commission and came home. He has been physician
for the county infirmary for the past fifteen years. Dr. Webster was
married to Miss
Emily A. Beckwith,
June 4, 1851. Have had two children. Darwin
P. was
born June 28, 1852; died in infancy. George
E. was
born July 25, 1858. The doctor is thoroughly Republican in politics; is
a member of the Presbyterian church; is a Knight Templar, and affiliates
with Cache commandery, No. 27, at Conneaut.
----- Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page127 |
H. H. Webster |
DR. HIRAM WEBSTER was
born in Lanesborough, Berkshire county, Massachusetts, on May 17, 1800.
He is the second child of Clark
and Naamah Hall Webster.
When he was five year of age his parents removed to Franklin, Delaware
county, New York. After two years passed at this point his father made
a trip to "New Connecticut," as the Western Reserve was then called, and
without making a purchase of land put in a piece of wheat on the
Ashtabula flats. This land was owned by Matthew Hubbard.
Returning to Franklin for his family, he soon started for Ohio,
calculating to reach Buffalo on runners. At Skaneateles he found two
families named Pratt and Bartlett also
en-route for the "promised land," and in company with them proceeded
onward and in due time arrived at Black Rock, where they found a large
open boat, which was offered them at a low price, as it had become
unseaworthy,—indeed was almost a wreck. However, an arrangement was
effected whereby Mr. Webster repaired
the boat, and in return was given a passage for his family and goods to
Ashtabula Landing. It was not altogether a safe voyage, as not one of
the company was acquainted with handling a boat except Mr. Webster.
The motive power was oars and setting-poles, aided by extemporized sails
of bed blankets and sheets. There were twenty-one on board at night the
boat was beached and made fast, the greater portion of the passengers
going ashore to sleep. An incident is related in which the subject of
this sketch was an active participant. He and a younger brother were
sleeping on the boat in company with several other persons; about
midnight he was shaken quite roughly by an old lady of the party, and
ordered to get off the boat quickly, as it was sinking. In the dense
darkness he was unable to find his brother, and while groping about in
search of him doubtless got in the way of the said female; be that as it
may, the result was a sudden push and an equally sudden plunge into the
lake being near the bow, however, the water was not deep, yet before
getting out his feet and his head became submerged, and he “shipped”
considerable water. Reaching Ashtabula, tarried there until June, 1809,
when the family removed to Kingsville and made a permanent settlement.
In the twenty-first year of his age, Hiram
Hall Webster commenced
the study of medicine, and in 1825 entered upon the practice of his
profession, and diligently pursued it until his son, Dr.
E. M.,
was qualified to take the labors upon himself, when the doctor left the
field. Those years of pioneer practice were fraught with hardship and
often danger.
Dr. Webster was
united in marriage, in April, 1824, to Corinna Lucinda,
daughter of Russel
and Corinna Loomis,
of Windsor township, this county. The fruits of this union are Corinna
Naamah,
born Mar. 10, 1825, married Rev.
E. C. Williams (deceased); Eleazur
Michael,
born May 21, 1827; Laura
Ann,
born July 8, 1829, died in infancy; Ann Eliza,
born Dec. 14, 1830, married Darwin
P. Venen,
and is deceased; Clarinda
L.,
born Aug. 19, 1833, married D.
P. Venen; Charles Hiram,
born July 21, 1836; and Henry Clark,
the youngest, who was born Feb. 11, 1842, was a soldier of the Union
army, and died at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Oct. 8, 1862. The wife
of Dr. Webster is
likewise deceased, since which time he has resided with his son, Dr. E.
M. Dr.
Webster, senior,
is a worthy member of the fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons, and a
Republican in politics.
----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations
and Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by
Publ. Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 127 |
Hon. Horace Wilder |
HON. HORACE WILDER,
one of several sons of a farmer of limited means, was born upon a spur
of the "Berkshire hills" in West Hartland, Connecticut, Aug. 20, A. D.
1802. In 1819 he entered, and in the class of 1823 graduated, at Yale
college with honor. He almost immediately entered as a law-student the
office of the Hon. Elisha Phelps,
of Simsbury, Connecticut, where he pursued the study of his profession
until the spring of 1824, when he went to Virginia, and for about two
and a half years was there employed in teaching a “family” school in the
family and upon the plantation of Mrs. Morton,
of Stafford county. It is believed that the Hon.
James A. Seddon, secretary
of war of the Confederate States, was one of his pupils. During this
period he devoted his leisure hours to the study of the aw, books being
procured for him at an office in Fredericksburg. In January, 1826 he
was “ licensed” to practice in the courts of Virginia, but in the fall
of that year he returned to Hartland, where he remained during the
winter, and in the spring of 1827 left for Ohio, where he had determined
to make his future home. His first point was Claridon, Geauga county,
at which place he had a sister (Mrs.
Judge Taylor)
residing. Shortly before this, Edson Wheeler, Esq.,
of East Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, a lawyer of character and
influence, had deceased; and, after inquiry and consultation with
members of the bar in the vicinity, Mr. Wilder located
at that place. Never having “practiced,” by the law of the State he was
compelled to wait a year before admission.
At the August (1828) term of the superior court in Geauga county he
was duly admitted to the bar, in the mean time doing his professional
business in the name of a friend. In October, 1833, he was elected
prosecuting attorney of Ashtabula County, and in the fall of 1834 was
elected representative to the State legislature,—the only office of a
political character ever held by him. In 1837 he removed to Conneaut.
In 1833 he married Phebe
J. Coleman,
the eldest daughter of the late Elijah
Coleman, M.D.,
well known to all the residents of the county of the past generation. Mrs. Wilder died
in 1847. He never re-married. Mr.
Wilder,
during the entire period of his active life, devoted himself exclusively
to his books and professional duties, turning neither to the right hand
nor to the left, and at a comparatively early day earned for himself an
enviable reputation as a sound and skillful lawyer, a safe and prudent
counselor, and an honest and honorable man. In 1855 he was elected
judge of the court of common pleas for the third subdivision of the
ninth judicial district (composed of the counties of Ashtabula, Lake,
and Geauga), to fill the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Judge
R. Hitchcock,
and in 1856 was again elected to the same position for the full term of
five years.
In 1862, soon after his term expired, Judge Wilder was
appointed by the late Governor Tod draft
commissioner for the county of Ashtabula, and as such superintended and
conducted the first draft of troops made in the county.
In the spring of 1S63 he removed to Ashtabula and formed a
copartnership, in the practice of the law. with E.
H. Fitch, Esq.,
under the name of Wilder & Fitch.
This business arrangement was of but brief duration, for, in December,
1863, Judge Wilder was
appointed by Governor Tod a
judge of the supreme court, to fill the vacancy created by the
resignation of Judge Gholson,
and in the fall of 1864 was elected to the same position for the balance
of Judge Gholson’s term.
In 1865, Judge Wilder resumed
practice at Ashtabula. In May, 1867, he retired from active business and
removed to Red Wing, Minnesota, where he has since resided with and as
part of the family of his younger brother, E.
T. Wilder,
between whom, even for brothers, very intimate relations have always
existed.
In politics, Judge Wilder was
a Whig so long as the Whig party existed. After it disappeared he
affiliated with the Republican party until some years subsequent to the
close of the war, when, dissatisfied with the policy of that party
towards the south, he has since been more nearly in harmony with the
Democratic party, though not fully identified with it.
In early life Judge Wilder was.
in religious matters, inclined to adopt views not in all respects deemed
orthodox, but in later years these opinions have been entirely changed,
and he now is and for some years has been a communicant of the
Protestant Episcopal church.
His decisions from the bench are enduring testimonials to his
familiarity with the law and to the accuracy of his legal acquirements.
Both his natural and acquired ability peculiarly fitted him for the
duties of a judge. In scholarship thorough, in judgment sound, his
knowledge of the law extensive, and its exactness unquestioned, in
character irreproachable, and to business scrupulously attentive, he was
a jurist who honored the position he filled.
During his long residence in Ashtabula County he gained the warm
friendship of a large circle of acquaintances, by whom he is still
remembered with strong affection.
----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations
and Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by
Publ. Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 89 |
Res. of
Geo. Willard,
Ashtabula,
Ashtabula Co., O
George Willard
Mrs. George Willard
--
Interior View of
George Willard's
Drug Store
--
Willard Block
George Willard,
Proprietor
Ashtabula, OH
Willard Block
as of the year 2020
|
Ashtabula
-
GEORGE WILLARD was
born in Holland patent, New York, on the 12th day of August, 1812, and
is the fifth of a family of twelve children born to Simon
and Rhoda Wills Willard,
originally of Weathersfield, Connecticut, but who removed in 1804 to
Holland patent, where they remained until 1834, at which date they came
to Ashtabula township. There the parents died,—the mother January 21,
1842, and the lather November 18, 1850. Of the brothers and sisters of George
Willard,
all are dead except one, the oldest brother, William,
who is still a resident of Ashtabula. The education of Mr. Willard was
acquired through the medium of our American system of common schools,
after the completion of which he began what has proved to be the
occupation of his life, that of merchandising, making his debut, in
1828, as clerk in a general store and forwarding and commission house,
at Whitestown, Oneida county, New York. The Erie canal was then in its
palmiest days. Remained here, engaged in this avocation, until 1831,
when he came to Ashtabula, Ohio, and for the succeeding five years was
clerk in the post-office and store of A.
C. Hubbard.
In April, 1836, Mr. Willard associated
himself with Richard Roberts,
and, under the firm-name of Roberts
& Willard,
opened, in the north half of the double two-story brick block built by H.
J. Rees,
a stock of goods, consisting of drugs, medicines, groceries, hardware,
nails, and iron. This firm continued in business only about six months,
when the death of Mr. Roberts occurred.
From this time until 1844, Mr. Willard conducted
the business in his own name. He, however, rented the south half of the
building, and put in a dry goods stock. In 1844 the firm was changed to
that of George Willard &
Co., by the admission of S.
B. Wells, Esq., a
former clerk, as a partner. General produce became a feature of the
business at this time. In the year 1850 the firm was again changed, by
the admission of another clerk (Henry Griswold),
to Willard, Wells &
Co. In 1855, Messrs. Wells and Griswold withdrew.
Since this time Mr. Willard has
been the sole proprietor. The fine three-story brick block which he now
occupies was erected in 1874. The first real estate purchased by Mr. Willard in
this township was the lot upon which stands his present business block.
This was in the year 1838, and the subsequent year he purchased the
property now occupied by William Willard. Mr. George Willard has
been engaged in the mercantile business in this city for forty-two
years, in addition to five years’ service in the same occupation as
clerk. During this time has been quite largely engaged in lake
commerce. Had a controlling interest, in whole or in part, in the
following vessels, viz., schooners “ B. F. Wade,” “Boston,”
“ Julia Willard,” “ York State,” and the bark “ Naomi.” Has served as
mayor one term, and member of the common council of the “ incorporated
village of Ashtabula” for several terms. Has also been township
trustee. Has been one of the directors of the Farmers’ National bank
from its organization. Was director and president of the Ashtabula
County Central plank-road company for a number of years. This road was
constructed some time prior to the opening of the Franklin division of
the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern railroad, and extended from
Ashtabula Harbor to the village of Jefferson, and thence on to the
lumber region in Richmond township. This road was for its time a great
convenience. Politically, Mr. Willard is
ardently Republican.
On the 15th day of September, 1833, he was united in marriage to Julia Francis,
daughter of Err
W. and Sarah Slawson Mead,
who were living at the time in Ashtabula. No children have blest this
union. He is a member of the Episcopal church. Mr. Willard served
as a member of the vestry and treasurer several years, and as senior
warden some twenty years. Thus have we briefly sketched the life of one
of Ashtabula’s representative business men. The pioneer in trade, he
has grown gray in its prosecution. As a business man, he has been
longer in service than any other citizen of Ashtabula. He has ever
proven himself a useful and public-spirited citizen. The best interests
of his village and of his county and of his church he has always
zealously striven to promote. Quiet and unassuming, he is nevertheless
an influential citizen, and universally esteemed for his many sterling
qualities. The name of George Willard will
not be forgotten when in coming years other generations shall be the
denizens of this beautiful village.
Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 144 |
H. B. Woodbury |
HON.
HAMILTON BLOSS WOODBURY is
the eldest of a family of six children. His parents were Ebenezer B.
Woodbury, who was born in New Hampshire, and removed to Ohio in
1811, and Sylva Woodbury, born in Cazenovia, Madison county, New
York, and came to Ohio in 1816. They were living in Kelloggsville, this
county, when the subject of this sketch was born Nov. 27, 1831. They,
however, removed to Jefferson after a term of years, and the mother is
yet a resident of that village, the father having died Aug. 14, 1870. Judge Woodbury was
educated in the common and select schools of Ashtabula County. When
seventeen years of age he entered the law office of his father at
Kelloggsville, and began the study of the profession in which to-day he
occupies a high position. In the year 1852, at the September term of
the district court of Ashtabula county, he was admitted to practice.
Some twelve years since, he was admitted to practice in the United
States courts. In 1854 he was elected a justice of the peace for the
township of Monroe, this county, and re-elected in 1857. In October of
that year he removed to Jefferson, where he still resides. Has held
numerous offices; among these we may mention trustee of the township and
mayor of the village. In April, 1873, he was elected a delegate to the
constitutional convention of Ohio. He now occupies the position of
common pleas judge of the third subdivision of the ninth judicial
district of Ohio, having been elected in January, 1875, and again
re-elected in October of the same year. On the 5th of September, 1863,
he was by his excellency Governor David Tod commissioned
as lieutenant-colonel of the Second Regiment Ohio Volunteer Militia,
which position he held until the disbanding of the organization.
The wife of Judge Woodbury was Mary E., daughter of Peter
and Sarah W. Hervey, to whom he was united in marriage at Jefferson,
Ohio, on the 12th day of October, 1854.
Four children have blessed this union. They are Frederick H.,
born Oct. 24, 1855; M. Jennie, born Sept. 10, 1857; Hamilton
B., born Dec. 17, 1867; and Walter W., whose birth occurred
June 19, 1871. Politically Judge Woodbury is a Republican. As a
jurist it is perhaps correct to say that no sounder one is known to the
courts of northern Ohio. Conversant with the law, his decisions are
rarely called in question, and he presides over the tribunals of justice
with dignity and firmness.
----- Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page 91
NOTE: See additional
biography
in Biographical History of Northeastern Ohio publ. 1893. |
Ephm T. Woodruff |
Wayne Twp. -
REV. EPHRAIM TREADWELL WOODRUFF
was born at Farmington, Connecticut, Oct. 17, 1777, and was the youngest
son of Timothy Woodruff, by his first wife, Lucy Treadwell,
sister of John Treadwell, one of the governors of Connecticut.
He graduated at Yale college in 1797. Rev. James Murdock,
who, in 1848, wrote a work entitled "Brief Memoirs of the Class of
1797," says in his preface to that work: "The Class of 1797 is
distinguished for the longevity of its members, twenty-four out of
thirty-seven, or about two-thirds of all that graduated, being alive
after a separation of half a century." He also says: "It was
distinguished for the uniform good scholarship of its members."
Among its graduates are such well-known names as Henry Baldwin,
judge of the United States supreme court; Lyman Beecher, D.D.;
Judge Thomas Day, official reporter of the supreme court of
Connecticut; and Horatio Seymour, Sr. Mr. Woodruff, after
finishing his theological course as the pupil of Rev. Charles Backus,
D. D., of Somers, Connecticut, and teaching the academy at Stonington
one year, was ordained pastor of the church in North Coventry, Tolland
county, Connecticut. His health failed him in 1817 so much that he
resigned his pastoral charge, and he took a commission from the
Missionary society of Connecticut to labor on the "Connecticut Western
Reserve in Ohio." He, however, stopped for one year at Little
Falls, Herkimer county, New York, and taught an academy. He
arrived in Wayne, Ashtabula County, in April, 1819, and became the first
pastor of the church, settling upon a tract of land which he purchased
from Issacher Jones, of Connecticut, all heavily timbered, and
upon which the sound of the woodman's axe had not been heard; but with
the generous aid of such stout hands and hearts as were possessed by
Nathaniel Coleman, Samuel Tuttle, Jonathan Tuttle, Norman Wilcox, Joseph
Ford, Deacon Ezra Leonard, Samuel Jones, Deacon Calvin Andrews, Simon
Fobes, Titus Hayes, Elisha Giddings, and Joseph Giddings, he
soon erected a log house, in which his family, consisting of his wife
and sister and six children, were made as comfortable as any of his
congregation. He preached one-half of his time in Wayne, while the
remainder was spent in missionary work and in the distribution of Bibles
all through the wilderness for more than fifty miles in every direction
from his home. On that same spot he died, on the twenty-sixth day
of November, 1859, at the age of eighty-two years. On his
death-bed, being in great pain, he said to his youngest son: "This is a
rough road to travel, but its roughness has elevated spots, from which I
see 'the city' beyond."
Mr. Woodruff was married Oct. 7, 1801, to
Sally Alden, orphan daughter of Jonathan Alden, a lineal
descendant of John Alden, the pilgrim of Plymouth Rock of that
name. She died in 1829. In 1832 he married Susan Porter.
He had no children by his second wife. His oldest daughter, born
in 1804, was the wife of Hon. Seth Hayes, of Hartford, Trumbull
county. She died in 1850. Phoebe married Dr. T. J.
Kellogg, of Girard, Erie county, Pennsylvania. Jonathan
Alden, a graduate of Hamilton college, and Presbyterian minister,
died Sept. 12, 1876, at Imlay City, Michigan. Harriet died
in 1828, at the age of eighteen years. Charlotte Maria, who
married J. B. Clark, of Kelloggsville, Ashtabula County, removed
to Michigan, and died in 1871. Samuel Ebenezer, born Mar.
31, 1817, is an attorney-at-law, and with his son, Thomas S..,
constitutes the firm of S. E. & T. S. Woodruff, attorneys-at-law,
Erie, Pennsylvania, and in which county the senior partner of the firm
has practiced his profession for thirty-four years.
The first meeting house in Wayne was erected in 1816.
A grave-yard was opened upon the tract of land purchased, as before
mentioned, by Mr. Woodruff. The meeting house was in
dimensions twenty-eight by thirty-six feet, built of legs hewn only on
the inside. A heard pulpit, ascended by five steps, stood at the
north end; a singers' gallery, six steps high, of the same material,
extended across the south end, with wings about ten feet along the east
and west sides. A hearth of rough cobble-stones, about six feet
square, in the centre of the building, without either chimney or
stove-pipe, was the only fires-place previous to 1825. At first
most of the seats were slabs without backs; but they were crowded with
true, faithful worshipers every Sabbath-day. They were not of the
fair-weather kind. At the right of the pulpit sat the elder
Deacon Leonard. He generally selected and read the hymns; he
was a noble man, six feet in height, with flowing white hair, knee- and
shoe-buckles, faultlessly clean, white bosom, rich, sonorous voice, and
one of the best of readers. In the west wing of the gallery
Elisha Giddings was the leading bass singer; in the centre,
Captain Levi Leonard let the tenor, assisted by his nephew,
Marvin Leonard, son of the deacon, and who, some time after the
death of his father, which occurred in 1929, became a deacon of the
church. Linus H. Jones was one of the prominent members of
the choir, composed of about twenty persons. The music was of a
high order, on account of the heart and soul it possessed. This
meetinghouse stood on the identical spot where the Rev. George
Roberts, a subsequent pastor, lived immediately before his death.
It was burned down about the year 1929. This church was highly
prosperous, and its membership was increased to more than two
hundred.
The chief obstacle to Mr. Woodruff's usefulness
as a pastor was the bronchial complaint that had compelled him to leave
Coventry. This affected his utterance so much as to make it
difficult at times to be heard by a large audience; yet, it is doubtful
if his efficiency and usefulness as a pastor were much affected for many
years, yet it detracted somewhat from his popularity as an orator,
though his success and reputation as such fully sustained the character
ascribed to him by an eastern cotemporary. "He was an excellent
pastor." He continued in the pastoral relation of the original
church until about 1835, when the infirmities of age, and the consequent
failure of his vocal powers and hearing, induced him to resign, and
attend church as a listener, often standing in a leaning position upon
the front of the pulpit, so that his dull ears might not fail to catch
each word that fell from the lips of the speaker. In a letter to
his son Samuel, dated Dec. 7, 1856, he says: "On the Lord's-day I
get out with my family, without fail, and attend to my Bible-class of
aged members, who gather together with great regularity, with the
simplicity of little children, to receive instruction. I wait upon
them with great delight." In further addressing his son in regard
to his hope, confidence, and appreciation of the great refuge, as he was
nearing the end of his days upon earth, in closing, he says:
“If thou, my Jesus, still art nigh,
Cheerful I live, and cheerful die
When mortal comforts flee.
To find ten thousand worlds in Thee.
“Great King of Grace, my heart subdue
I would be led in triumph too,
A willing captive to my Lord,
And sing the triumphs of His word.” |
Among the former
residents of the township of Wayne no family is more kindly remembered
or associated with stronger ties of friendship and appreciation, than
that of Ephraim T. Woodruff.
----- Source:
1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with Illustrations and
Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ.
Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Pages 248-249
|
|
Kingsville
Twp. -
MARSHALL WILLIAM WRIGHT,
INFIRMARY DIRECTOR, a fine portrait of whom appears in connection with
the sketch of the county infirmary, was born on the 27th day of August,
1818, and is a child of Sherman
and Fanny Howes Wright, originally
of Wilbraham, Hampden county, Massachusetts, but who removed to Ohio and
located in the township of Conneaut in the fall of 1811, where they
resided until their decease, which occurred—the father's on Jan. 3,
1847, and the mother’s Jan. 15, 1872. The education of Mr. Wright was
received at a common district school, principally at the school-house on
the south ridge in Conneaut. His time was divided between labor in his
father’s tannery and shoe-shop, and the tilling of the small farm owned
by him, until his failure in business in 184S, since which time he has
served his township and the county in the discharge of various public
trusts. He was first elected a justice of the peace in 1851, and since
that date has been an incumbent of that office some thirteen years, and
still administers justice to those who are unfortunately compelled to
resort to the law to settle their differences. In the year 1853 he was
elected to the office of sheriff of Ashtabula County, and served two
terms, and in 1868 was elected county commissioner, and continued in
office one term of three years; was elected to his present position as
infirmary director in the fall of 1877. He has also served as trustee
of his township several terms, and for the greater portion of the time
since attaining his majority has filled the office of school director.
On the 1st of August, 1862, he entered the volunteer service of the
United States in the capacity of quartermaster of the One Hundred and
Fifth Regiment Ohio Volunteer Infantry; served until April, 1864, at
which time he was compelled by failing health to resign. In reply to
the question, “Were you wounded ?” he answered, "Once only, when at home
on leave of absence in 1863, by a friend congratulating me on the
position I held in the service, which would give me an opportunity
to make money"
On the 27th day of March, 1844, Esquire Wright was
united in marriage to Miss Sarah Wayland,
daughter of the Rev. Asa and Sarah Saxton Jacobs,
of Conneaut (this county). The children of this marriage are Elizabeth,
born Feb. 9, 1845; married Levi
T. Scofield,
and now resides in Cleveland, Ohio. Lydia,
born Mar. 20, 1847; married Conrad
J. Brown;
residence, Erie, Pennsylvania. Altie,
born Apr. 23, 1850; married the Rev.
Jeremiah Phillips, Jr.,
and whose home is now in Kenosha county, Wisconsin. Sherman, the next
child, was born September 29, 1854; and Nellie, the last, whose birth
occurred on Jan. 8, 1859.
The ’squire was from the outset a Liberty-party man, and is, as a
matter of course, at this writing a Republican, and believes that one
hundred cents should make a dollar. He is a member of Kingsville post,
Grand Army of the Republic, and his religious belief is in keeping with
the tenets of the Free-Will Baptist church, of which he is a member. We
cannot perhaps better close this sketch than by quoting from the notes
of the gentleman himself: "Have thus far lived on my own resources;
none of my family have as yet been charged with crime, have became a
public charge or a member of congress."
----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula
County, Ohio with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of its
Pioneers and Most Prominent Men by Publ. Philadelphia - Williams
Brothers - 1878 - Page 208 |
|
Conneaut
Twp. -
REV. ORRIN T. WYMAN.
This gentleman was born at Millville, Orleans county, New York, Aug. 25,
1836. His parents, who were natives of New England, were Oliver
and Emily Wyman.
The mother is yet living; the father died in 1861. The education of
the Rev.
Mr. Wyman was
academic. In 1855, feeling the need of a better preparation for the
ministry, he, in September, entered “ Meadville Theological School” for
one year, then became a pupil of Antioch college (Yellow Springs,
Ohio). Sickness obliged him to leave this school after two mouths.
September, 1857, returned to Meadville, Pennsylvania, completed a
three-years’ course, and graduated June, 1859. About Oct. 1, 1854, he
left home with an uncle—Rev.
S. H. Morse,
evangelist—to assist in revival meetings in Chautauqua county, New
York. Preached his first sermon at Fluvanna, New York, Jan. 14, 1855.
After leaving school continued his studies, and supplied churches at
different points in Orleans and Chautauqua counties. Was ordained at a
special session of Erie Christian conference, called for that purpose at
De Wittville, New York. June, 1862, and on the 15th of same month
delivered his first sermon in the Christian church at Conneaut, Ohio.
The membership, when he became pastor of this church, was not numerous,
but during the sixteen years he has been in charge, he has raised its
membership to two hundred and fifty, and has thoroughly repaired the
church edifice. His labors have certainly been crowned with merited
success. He is a strong advocate of temperance, and a member of the
Independent Order of Good Templars and Royal Templars of Temperance. In
politics, Republican. He is also president of the Erie Christian
conference, and a trustee of “ Christian Biblical Institute,” at
Stanfordville, New York.
On the 7th of September, 1859, he was united in marriage to Miss
T. V.,
daughter of Newell
and Lucy Putnam,
also natives of the New England States. This estimable lady received an
academic education, and was a teacher for several terms. She is also a
member of the Christian church.
But one child has blessed this union, Benson N., whose birth
occurred on June 17, 1863.
----- Source: 1798 History of Ashtabula County, Ohio with
Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of its Pioneers and Most
Prominent Men by Publ. Philadelphia - Williams Brothers - 1878 - Page
169 |
NOTES:
|